« Word from Rome | Main | »

February 06, 2004

Innocence Denied

My daughter, my only daughter, is twelve years old. She is almost as tall as I am, has glasses, shoulder-length brown hair, and retainers on her teeth.

She is in the sixth grade at a Catholic school, and is fairly innocent of the ways of the world, as much as is possible with two older brothers who taught her to mainline The Simpsons way too early. But other than that, I think I've held the line pretty well.

In fact, just a couple of weeks ago, in response to something she heard on the news she asked me what a "prostitute" was. She read an article in the entertainment section earlier this week on Friends, and she asked me what it was about, and then, perhaps because the article referenced it, she asked me what Sex in the City was about. I told her briefly and said, "Some people call it Sluts in the City."

"What's a slut?" She asked. Completely seriously. She had no idea what it meant.

So anyway, I have this no-so little girl anymore who loves her friends and sports and music and the theater. She is at the age where she is, quite obviously, looking around her and trying to figure out who she is supposed to be as a person. As a female person.

So she watches me - always too closely, as kids do. She watches the mothers of her friends (always cooler than me, and that's okay.) She watches her female teachers.

And in her spare time, she watches old movies, and she curls up with books. This week she read An Old-Fashioned Girl by Louisa May Alcott, and, coupled with her reading of Alcott's other books, and the Ann of Avonlea book, I can see her observing those girls and women, too. In another time, certainly, but in the context, smart, independent, strong women going off and doing their thing, striking out into the big city or into where ever life takes them, resolute, thinking well of themselves because they are - good people. Because they are, simply people.

So there she is, and I can see her watching all of this, and in some way modeling herself after the qualities she likes the best. She likes the fantasy, probably not even possibly realized since about 1953, of being the gal who sets out for the big city, willing to write great articles and thick novels, or try out for the Big Show, or, as she said to me one night, "Just come home to my apartment, sit at my piano, and play jazz."

A fantasy, yes. But not a bad fantasy.

But, of course, there are other places to look, and as hard as I try - yes- to protect her from this, and shield her eyes - she sees it. She sees it in some of her classmates, who are on the fast track to Popularity, and have been since 1st grade. She sees it if she flicks on a video, or listens to some kinds of music, or happens upon a certain movie, tv show or add.

And what do they say? They say - here's who you are, as an American female in 2004.

Be, essentially, a courtesan. That's where your life and priorities should be - in preening and flaunting your sexuality, and centering your life on when you get laid, by whom and how often.

My heart breaks, because it is so horribly diminished. My anger grows because I fail to see, with this as the fruit, what cultural feminism has brought our daughters. And I go back upstairs, resolute, to not give up, and to teach my daughter, as my mother taught me, to refuse to be defined by this oppression, for that is what it is. There is no freedom in this. And ultimately, there is no joy.


A clarification I put in the comments, and will repeat up here:

I'm a feminist. Some of you terribly wise commentors may not believe it, but I am.

But my comment was on the practically negligable impact of what some of us thought feminism was supposed to be about on the portrayal of women in culture.

My point is similar to a joke I heard someone - maybe Dennis Miller - make in the aftermath of the Woody Allen/Soon Yi business.

"Woody Allen's been in therapy for thirty years. Here's my message to his therapist:

Good job!"

I think it is questionable whether the form that feminism has taken on the cultural stage, within the context of an aggressive commercial culture has made it more or less possible to critique negative imagery of women in culture.

My stance would be that the direction has taken has made it less: In the name of freedom - not just for women, but for all of us - limits are the only unpermissable thing.

Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451be0d69e200d83455f47869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Innocence Denied:

» Make 'em Drag Ya from Dust in the Light
Much as he would yell at athletes on the television, my father liked to offer advice to the characters in the movies that we would watch. One of the most frequent mistakes that fictional characters make occurs during abductions —... [Read More]

Tracked on Feb 7, 2004 4:48:44 PM

» the dignity of women from Random Musings
[Editor's Note: I wrote this awhile ago but never posted it. For your viewing pleasure, I changed the date so it would show up above the fold.] Innocence Denied I found this link via Fr. Jim's Dappled Things. While I've... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 17, 2004 12:07:32 AM

Comments

Triple Amen.

Posted by: David at Feb 6, 2004 4:28:02 PM

My oldest will be nine this year, you hit home again. Between these thoughts and the news from FL this morning.....

Posted by: Jerry at Feb 6, 2004 4:42:03 PM

Triple, quadruple, amen. Think of the effect of popular culture on a now-13 year old girl who when she was younger had frequent episodes of asthma so bad that all she could do was watch the tube. We do frequent and prolonged media fasts, but the tug of the culture is powerful.

Posted by: Captain Yips at Feb 6, 2004 4:47:54 PM

One of the things my wife and I have noticed when buying clothes for our 3-year old daughter is that we have to buy larger sizes because the shirts are being cut--Britney-style--to reveal the stomach. Sometimes--particularly in light of today's news from Florida--the future seems a scary place.

I'm not sure how much blame I'm willing to lay at the feet of Feminism as a whole. That movement is a river with many streams. Certainly my mother, who founded the NOW chapter in my hometown, was not fighting to make the world safe for the casual "hook-up." I think her vision was more about making it easier for women to head off to the Big City, write those novels, and play jazz. I think that's still a vision worth fighting for, whether one calls it "feminisim" or something else.

Posted by: Peter Nixon at Feb 6, 2004 4:54:00 PM

You are right, I think that Feminism is at least being used as a shield for this further objectification of women. And the changes that Feminism caused laid us ever more open to our human natures that want more and want it now. Noone loses money by exploiting and marketing women. And a younger age at which to start the consumer(of clothes, music, videos. products) off with the addiction is better for the economy. Right?

Posted by: Margaret at Feb 6, 2004 5:11:08 PM

Well said Amy.

My oldest is now 13 and similarly shielded from the culture, even considering a call to become a nun.

So many questions:

She wants to change the world for good. When do we let her know just how bad it is?

John

Posted by: John Weems at Feb 6, 2004 5:18:22 PM

The stream of garbage that encourages the use of women's bodies like that has nothing to do with feminism. Making women objects? Making women toys? Making girls want to grow up to be objects and toys? Nah. That's not feminism. Calling that feminism is an insult to something important.

Feminism means working to make sure that your daughter (and all our daughters and sisters and mothers and us) is free to go to the big city and play jazz, or to stay home and raise babies, or do both, or do neither.

And using that freedom to promote sluts in the city -- well, that's a damn shame, but it's not feminism's fault.

Posted by: ANR at Feb 6, 2004 5:41:43 PM

>And using that freedom to promote sluts in the city -- well, that's a damn shame, but it's not feminism's fault.

Yup.

Posted by: Nance at Feb 6, 2004 5:46:26 PM

I agree with Peter and ANR on this one, Amy. I, too, have a 13-year old (going on 26 somedays!) daughter and as a father, I see myself more and more as a pro-feminist.... Strongly supporting my daughter's efforts to do whatever she wants and is capable of doing -- play sports competitively (remember there was a time when people who favored allowing 'girls' to compete in such 'strenuous' activities like basketball, soccer and lacrosse were considered radical feminists because, of course, we all KNEW that there bodies weren't made for such athletic strain!) ... be a lawyer, doctor, or stay-at-home mom (remember the old days when the 'joke' was the girl went to college to get her MRS degree?). I want her to feel she has real leadership potential in her Church, too (and that fact probably REALLY irritates a lot of this blog's readers!).

Has our culture gotten sleazy? You bet. But sexy sideline reporters aren't there for the women; Janet Jackson isn't taking off her top for women. Believe it or not, Sex in the City and The L Word aren't on to attract women viewers. This, I am ashamed to say, is a product of a male-dominated culture demanding to have their immediate sexual gratification. And many generations are going to pay the price for our misdeeds of today.

Posted by: Kirk at Feb 6, 2004 5:51:53 PM

Unfortuatley all you have to do is let her watch a few "Sex in The City" episodes and some MTV...so she can fully realize her potential or place in life.... In reference to the horrible murder 11 year old in Florida...I wonder if pornography fed his murderous passions?

Posted by: Tom at Feb 6, 2004 5:54:50 PM

Unfortunately all you have to do is let her watch a few "Sex in The City" episodes and some MTV...so she can fully realize Holloywood's expected potential for her....Children should not be bombarded with such messages and lose their innocence so fast and so young. In reference to the horrible murder 11 year old little girl in Florida...I wonder if pornography fed his murderous passions?

Posted by: Tom at Feb 6, 2004 5:58:07 PM

Dear Amy:

God bless you! My daughter is now 20 and a sophomore at Harvard U's extension college. I remember so well those days where your daughter is at. Mine was an altar server, choir member, girl scout (till she found out that they didn't do any hiking). She eschewed the Brittany Spears girls' cliques and hung out with free spirits who were all pretty good kids. She read just like your daughter and was my right arm.

Then, then came the transformation. There were days that I thought an exorcist was needed. There were breaks of sanity, talent, placidity.

And my devotion to Sts. Rita, Teresa of Avila and Francis De Sales increased. Not to mention Padre Pio and St. Jude.

My son is 16 months younger and it was much easier to raise him with all of his male shenannigans.

I can say this...she kept a good heart through those troubled years. Today, she is a fine young woman with strong values and a dedication to searching for truth.

You and your husband will always be her ultimate models and though days may be hard, you will one day praise God for a fine young woman who calls you, "Mom!"

Posted by: John Hetman at Feb 6, 2004 5:59:20 PM

One of the advantages of being a gay man who, along with his partner, thought of and decided against the idea of adopting a child, is that, when I read of things like this, I have to honestly admit that I wouldn't have had a clue as to how to deal with it.

Parenting is such a special skill and I have nothing but the utmost in respect for those of you who have accepted the challenge and have done the best that you can/could.

The rest is up to God.

Posted by: Jimmy Mac at Feb 6, 2004 6:25:47 PM

In reply to the comments....their bodies can not compete with the physical strain of athletics. I have 5 daughters, 2 sons. They are all good athletes, playing in competive sports and having a great time. My oldest daughter had real difficulties with her periods in High school. Most of her friends who ran with her did as well. Her friend who is a championship dancer also had problems. It is not uncommon today for young women to stop menstruating completely with prolonged physical activity. Anorexia and bullemia is also prevalent in women athletes. When I took her to the doctor she said the only "natural" way for her to get back her cyle was to cut her running down. The doctor also knows me very well and said that she would suggest the "pill" to another mother for her daughter. "We've come a long way baby!"
There is usually a price to be paid for progress.

Posted by: Geraldine at Feb 6, 2004 6:27:44 PM

This, literally, makes me cry.

My niece is 7. Her parents let her play with the Bratz dolls, wear inappropriate clothing-- including a brassiere, she knows all the lyrics to any Top 40 song, and performs poorly in school.

Without a doubt, she'll be sexually active within a few years. It's so hard to pray for her salvation.

Posted by: Kate at Feb 6, 2004 6:28:43 PM

Of course it is feminism's fault. The sort of feminism that wasn't feminine at all, but really an attempt at masculinism. "Let's be free from responsibility, free from family, free from pregnancy!" Just like men. Or at least, just like the worst of men.

Feminism has been a bonanza to men who like sex without consequences.

Posted by: Karl at Feb 6, 2004 6:30:52 PM

Amy,

Don't worry. I think you should be glad your daughter is having these experiences. Yes, you read that right.

Expecting children to do the right things out of ignorance of evil is naive in iteself. We live in a corrupt society that eats the ignorant and naive alike.

Armed with knowledge your daughter can consciously decide not to make bad decisions. And thank God your daughter came and talked to you first! You now have a responsibility to teach her about the ways of the world and complete her formation.

I'm almost 30. When I was 11-12, there were girls in my middle school who I knew were having abortions. This was a *good* school too. I remember these girls sliding fast into fast life from childlike innocence because nobody ever told them not to do certain things and why those things were bad. When confronted with sex, drugs, etc. they responded according to peer pressure.

Have you explicitly told your daughter why having sex before marriage is bad? Have you taught her the counter arguments to be presented and how to refute them? If parents don't do these things, they shirk their responsibilities. We must teach our kids to know and identify our enemy.

Posted by: Ian at Feb 6, 2004 7:28:49 PM

New flash:

Do you know what? I'm a feminist. Some of you terribly wise commentors may not believe it, but I am.

But my comment was on the practically negligable impact of what some of us thought feminism was supposed to be about on the portrayal of women in culture.

My point is similar to a joke I heard someone - maybe Dennis Miller - make in the aftermath of the Woody Allen/Soon Yi business.

"Woody Allen's been in therapy for thirty years. Here's my message to his therapist:

Good job!"

Posted by: amy at Feb 6, 2004 7:33:36 PM

I think it is questionable whether the form that feminism has taken on the cultural stage has made it more or less possible to critique negative imagery of women in culture.

My stance would be that the direction has taken has made it less: In the name of freedom - not just for women, but for all of us - limits are the only unpermissable thing.

Posted by: amy at Feb 6, 2004 7:35:35 PM

Hang in there, you parents of young teenagers. Stick to your values and expect your girls to do the same. In the end it's worth whatever struggle is required.

My daughter is 25, a graduate student in analytical chemistry, and working toward her doctorate. So you could say she has been liberated. But her values--values she got at home--remain in tact. Her standards are high. Maybe sometimes too high, but I wouldn't change a thing about her.

When she was nearing her teens I had to decide whether to teach birth control or abstinence. I angonized over it some, and came down on the side of abstinence. It was the right decision.

I also kept contemporary music mostly out of the house except for Christian rock. She heard it everywhere else, but she knew the standards without a doubt. Today--would you believe it?--she buys Frank Sinatra CDs.

She also is faithful in going to Mass and is determined to either marry a Catholic or stay single. And we are still best friends.

Posted by: Carrie at Feb 6, 2004 8:07:30 PM

Feminism is now a loose concept. Its origins in Simone de Beauvoir and Betty Friedan were based on sterile myths by sad women-both. If one means by feminism that a woman has an equal chance to participate in an open and free society, taking her chances, making her grade on merit and not her sex, then I harken to the term. I am the dad of a twenty-year old daughter with a strong will and good values. But if feminism means excreting empty cliches, spouting repulsive slogans, being upset at every possible slip of the tongue and slight; if it means conjuring some inchoate power from Gaia, or assuming roles (i.e., the Catholic priesthood) that are reserved for males, reducing motherhood to some after-work avocation and demanding superior recognition based on biology, then count me as a male chauvinist pig.

Posted by: John Hetman at Feb 6, 2004 9:19:01 PM

I am reminded of the story of a Rhode Island teenager who was sent off to New York City after high school to study singing with a teacher that her mother knew. This was around 1940, and for the first few weeks, she cried herself to sleep every night because she did not want to stay there. Since her mother said she would have to get a job and stay there, she did the only thing she knew how to do, and found a job singing in the CBS Radio Chorus. After three months, they offered her her own weekly radio show, which she kept for 7 years.
She had a long and successful career in opera and pop music, and passed away two years ago at age 82. When I met her in New York in 1956, little did I know that she would make her opera debut in Tampa, FL and her Met debut in NYC in 1960. I recall that in 1992 she did an interview on the NPR program Fresh Air, and you may wish to hear the interview at this URL:

http://www.npr.org/dmg/dmg.php?prgCode=FA&show Date=25-Mar-2002&segNum=2&NPROldMediaPref=RM

You can paste this URL into your browser and then delete any spaces. Very interesting show!

Posted by: Calvin at Feb 6, 2004 9:28:18 PM

But what is there in the culture of the truly feminine? When the ist or the ism is added, they seem worlds apart. After they were added it seems stupidity took over and the real differences between men and women were stuffed in some closet. I don't worry so much about the young women in good families with good models and good examples who've also been fortunate to have inherited good intellectual genes, but rather all those little "sheep" who are pushed by the angry power crazed down some pretty dark tunnels of no return. There is an abundance of shame for those very "feminine" qualities which used to be thought of as powerful enough to "rule the world". The "ists" have now made it possible that in the future anything feminine will be totally smashed and women will even lose their God given rights, which they have voluntarily handed over, to bear children. Why no Masculinists for the men? Because they've always followed where the women have led them!

Posted by: Chris K. at Feb 6, 2004 9:50:17 PM

What good has "feminism" brought for females? Autonomy? Do they have it? Respect? Were they lacking it before? Dignity? Is this something a "movement" can bring?

Anyone willing to go tooth and nail could demonstrate the fallacies of this ideology. . . but is there any time left (ever) to consider the validity of ideologies?

Posted by: al at Feb 6, 2004 10:16:45 PM

I was brought up in a "traditional family," though of course, with six children, five of them girls, I was horribily abused (as the only boy).

I have been very impressed with my sisters. One in particular, who went to Emerson (it is in Boston, a very good liberal arts college, where she was the only person in a class who had ever handled a firearm, and clued them in about what the deal was, as well as dealing with a boyfriend of a roomate who got a bit physical. She has always liked Doc Martens.

Femininism has ideally been about giving people to tools to do what they wish. How it has been implemented has been a bit spotty.

I would be taunted mercilessly for my run on sentence earlier, btw. We all read a lot, despite a lot of TV, too. Odd, when I think of the current conceptions.

Posted by: Leo at Feb 6, 2004 10:46:04 PM

Post a comment