In my news-surfing over the weekend, I ran across an article that seemed promising - about Cardinal Arinze in Dallas. I read it, and went, "Huh?" It told me nothing - about why the Cardinal was in Dallas, what he said, and the interview was pure boilerplate.
At Get Religion, Terry Mattingly notes the same article
In other words, I am just as interested -- more, actually -- about what the cardinal had to say about Texans going to confession and receiving Communion than I am in the state of Kerry's pilgrimage. Perhaps the same is true of readers in Texas. I am just as interested in what the cardinal came to Dallas to say as I am in what he did not come to Dallas to say. Does that make sense?
It was either one of the worst written or most severely edited articles I've run across. Edited into nothingness...
Also at Get Religion Jeremy Lott ably reviews James Carroll's review of John Cornwell's book about John Paull II.
Got it?


Also at Get Religion Jeremy Lott ably reviews James Carroll's review of John Cornwell's book about John Paull II.
Got it?
Um, let me diagram that.....back in a sec...
Posted by: Christopher Rake | January 31, 2005 at 07:36 PM
Arinze is just "running for Pope" ...
Of course, actually saying that one is doing that is passe, so we are "apostolic mission outreach" or other nonsense phraseology.
Arinze has been on "baby kissing mode" now for quite some time.
Posted by: Tan2Day | February 01, 2005 at 08:36 AM
Rod may know more about this story--but then, he may not be at liberty to talk about it.
Posted by: Hunk Hondo | February 01, 2005 at 08:51 AM
The justification for the emphasis in the article is something like:
A religious figure with a worldwide reputation comes to Dallas.
The reason--otherwise unknown--for which he came to Dallas, which may involve speaking to thousands of Texans, is an internal Church matter, and therefore not news.
His views on the standing within the Church of a politician who was running for office and lost several months ago, which have been well publicized--the politician, moreover, not being from Texas or indeed being very popular in Texas--is not an internal Church matter, and therefore is news.
I don't think I'm the only one who senses a lapse of logic here.
Posted by: Henry Dieterich | February 01, 2005 at 09:27 AM
The cardinal as many other members of the USA and international hierarchy was in Dallas for the medical-moral conference (bio-ethics and such) sponsored by the Knights of Columbus. Sorry, no intrigue.
Posted by: CBM | February 01, 2005 at 10:19 AM
Bioethics is not news?
Posted by: Henry Dieterich | February 01, 2005 at 02:39 PM
The cardinal was also in Dallas to speak at the Southwest Liturgical Conference. My blog has links within a commentary.
Posted by: Todd | February 01, 2005 at 04:55 PM