In my news-surfing over the weekend, I ran across an article that seemed promising - about Cardinal Arinze in Dallas. I read it, and went, "Huh?" It told me nothing - about why the Cardinal was in Dallas, what he said, and the interview was pure boilerplate.
At Get Religion, Terry Mattingly notes the same article
In other words, I am just as interested -- more, actually -- about what the cardinal had to say about Texans going to confession and receiving Communion than I am in the state of Kerry's pilgrimage. Perhaps the same is true of readers in Texas. I am just as interested in what the cardinal came to Dallas to say as I am in what he did not come to Dallas to say. Does that make sense?
It was either one of the worst written or most severely edited articles I've run across. Edited into nothingness...