« Book Club | Main | Bishop Blair apologizes »
March 03, 2005
Speaking of Waugh...

I do love this book, and I'm so proud it's a part of our series. Before our edition, it was one of the very few Waugh novels not in print in the US.
Helena, obviously, is the story of St. Helena, mother of Constantine and finder of the True Cross. It was one of Waugh's favorites of his own work, if not the favorite, although it wasn't terrifically reviewed at the time, especially in the US.
Side note - one of the more interesting parts of my job has been to dig up contemporary reviews of the novel in question (reminds me - got to get to the library for the next batch.) - it's not very hard. There's this thing called Book Review Digest which contains the citations for reviews of books, arranged in volumes chronologically. One of the things I've noticed, in finding reviews for these novels originally published from the 1920's through the 1960's is that nothing much has changed. The secular press has always been rather hostile to spiritual themes in literature, and unimpressed by writers who try to take on those themes seriously, without irony.
Anyway, back to Helena. The novel is pure Waugh - tight, direct, not a wasted word. He begins with Helena as a horse-mad girl, the daughter of a chieftan, who ends up, in the course of a few days, betrothed to Constantinius, who will, in time, become emperor.
Waugh gives us a Helena who is used and discarded by her husband, and who accepts her lot as the first, heir-producing wife who does her duty and then is packed away. Her defining characteristic is her intelligence, and more specifically, her search for truth - for defining, spiritual truth. What moves her, what drives her is the desire to put her faith in something true. Something real. If it didn't really happen, if it's just a story, why bother with it?
It's this question she asks of every religious fad and tradition that comes her way, from her own peoples' mythology, to Roman gods, to the mystery religions that fascinate her husband. None of them, of course, have anything to offer her, until she happens upon Christianity, whose Lord walked a specific patch of the world during a definite span of years, and who had friends and disciples who documented their experiences...you can see where this is going and how beautifully it clears a path for Helen's interest in the True Cross.
This is a lovely, and quite often very witty novel. Yes, these 4th century characters speak as if it's 1932 London, but why not? Helena's brush-off of mythmakers and charlatans are sharp and pointed, even when she's in Jerusalem and is being presented with all kinds of outlandish stories about the fate of the True Cross. The portrait of Constantine is of a rather confused opportunist. Helena's own conversion, is interestingly enough, never directly described. It happens off stage, as it were.
One of the things we're looking for in books to reprint in our series is the presence of questions that people still ask, and helpful answers as well. Written half a century ago, Helena fits the bill, because the question of truth and what, exactly is the basis of our faith, is one that we still ask. Some say that it all comes down to a "story" that means something to you, that "speaks to you," and that should be a good enough definition of truth for anyone. Helena confronts us with that assertion, and, more importantly, invites us to consider it, as human beings - is that really enough? - and as Christians - is that really all Christianity is? - and frames it in a simply marvelous story.
Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink
Comments
I bought a used first edition of this book as a confirmation gift for my wife who took Helena as her confirmation name.
Unfortunately, neither she nor I have read it yet.
Posted by: Jay Anderson at Mar 4, 2005 12:01:47 AM
As I remember, "Helena" also includes an extended, and still pertinent, criticism of fads in art.
I found a copy in the library once and am richer for having read it-- picked the book up because George Wiegel said he'd re-read it on an airplane, and wondered if the pope had read it, too (he thought not, but also figured JPII would enjoy the story)
Posted by: Patrick O'Hannigan at Mar 4, 2005 1:29:46 AM
Does anyone know if its true that Waugh wrote this in recompense for his annulment from She-Evelyn?
Posted by: al at Mar 4, 2005 8:30:16 AM
Helena is sharp, short and funny. Its unmerited obscurity is probably due to the lack of an interesting (except intellectually) central character. Waugh's meditations on the limitations of politics are priceless(although his notion of Constantine is historically way off base - the Byzantines count him as a saint!). He develops brilliantly the central theme of the "concreteness" and historicity of Christianity compared to new - age type man-made myths. There are also some mysterious descriptive passages set in Britain centering around the day of Helena's marriage that provide an otherwise infrequent poetic element. A great work!
I am fearful of Weigel's introduction, though: Waugh's views on politics and its limits set forth in Helena don't jive with certain aspects of his ideology.
Posted by: stuart chessman at Mar 4, 2005 8:42:41 AM
I doubt Weigel "got political" in the introduction - he does talk about other things, you know. He certainly didn't mention the dreaded "neo-con" politics in his discussion of Waugh and Helena in Letters To a Young Catholic (by the way, read this book by Weigel if you haven't already).
Posted by: Jay Anderson at Mar 4, 2005 8:57:37 AM
I listened to an old BBC interview of Waugh a while ago and he said "Helena" was his favorite novel, which surprised the interviewer. Thanks for bringing this book back into print, Amy. I was first turned-on to it by Harry Crocker in "Triumph" but at the time the best one could do was buy a tattered old copy via eBay. Amazon just dropped me a note indicating the book is on its way.
Regarding '32 London, give Stephen Fry's movie "Bright Young Things", an adaptation of Waugh's "Vile Bodies", a try. Purists will object to some of Fry's liberties, especially with regard to the ending, but he captures the book's melancholy. (Waugh reportedly divorced his wife and joined the Church within nine months of its release.)
Dan Ackroyd is miscast though; he resembles an actor playing Dan Ackroyd pretending to be Daddy Warbucks.
Posted by: Rich Leonardi at Mar 4, 2005 9:15:28 AM
I like the clever and oblique jabs at contemporary follies delivered through the characters of the Constantinian court -- such as his portraying the Eusebiuses as liberal Anglican bishops -- but my favorite part is Helena's meditation on the meaning of Epiphany, addressed in prayer to the Magi. It was said that in the late 1950s John Gielgud began to read this on a BBC Christmas broadcast, broke up, and couldn't finish. As with all such passages, it's more powerful in context. The final bit:
"You are my special patrons," [Helena prays] "and patrons of all late-comers, of all who have had a tedious journey to make to the truth, of all who are confused with knowledge and speculation, of all who through politeness make themselves partners in guilt, of all who stand in danger by reason of their talents... For His sake who did not reject your curious gifts, pray always for the learned, the oblique, the delicate. Let them not be quite forgotten at the Throne of God when the simple come into their kingdom."
Posted by: PM at Mar 4, 2005 10:20:21 AM
I listened to an old BBC interview of Waugh a while ago and he said "Helena" was his favorite novel
Reminds me of how Mark Twain said his Joan of Arc was the favorite of his oeuvre. Interesting how both of these curmudgeons were closest to their least ironic/curmudgeonly books.
Posted by: TSO at Mar 4, 2005 1:21:55 PM
No, al, Waugh wrote 'Edmund Campion' (1935) as recompense for his 1935 annulment.... 'Helena' was written in 1950.
Posted by: Charles A. at Mar 4, 2005 9:26:03 PM



















