« Someone answer me.. |
| Story of an Underground Priest »
Disputations alerts us to a (retitled) re-issue of A Memoir of Mary Ann, with an intro by Flannery O'Connor, offered by the Hawthorne Domincans (who, of course, cared for Mary Ann in their Atlanta facility)
Posted by Amy Welborn Dubruiel at 09:49 AM | Permalink
| Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
O'Connor only wrote the foreword, which begins, "Stories of pious children tend to be false," and includes her memorable and prophetic claim,
"When tenderness is detatched from the source of tenderness, its logical outcome is terror. It ends in forced labor camps and in the fumes of the gas chamber."
Less memorable but as insightful, O'Connor writes of her impression of the manuscript, written by one of the Sisters, that she had been asked to edit:
"There was everything about the writing to make the professional writer groan... The story was as unfinished as the child's face [disfigured by a cancerous tumor]. Both seem to have been left, like creation on the seventh day, to be finished by others. The reader would have to make something of the story as Mary Ann had made something of her face."
June 24, 2005 at 11:38 AM
I was under the impression that she had, indeed, edited the manuscript heavily without being actually credited for it. I'll correct the post
June 24, 2005 at 11:46 AM
Oh, she probably did heavily edit the manuscript. Don't most editors have to?
The republished version, though, does say "by Sister M. Evangelist O.P.," where the original just said something like "by the Sisters of Our Lady of Perpetual Hope Home."
June 24, 2005 at 11:58 AM
Re ...when tenderness is detached...: I'm pretty sure a character in Walker Percy's The Thanatos Syndrome says something very close to this. I had no idea O'Connor had said it, too. It's close enough (unless my memory is wrong--it's been over 10 yrs since I read it) that Percy must have been alluding to or almost quoting her. Interesting.
Maclin Horton |
June 24, 2005 at 12:56 PM
The impression I got from O'Connor's LETTERS was that she edited the material heavily. Not seeing the actual book, only going by that discussion, the nuns regarded the little girl as a saint and hoped her story would be beneficial to others. Pity Rome didn't notice while they were canonizing everyone in sight.
Sandra Miesel |
June 24, 2005 at 01:13 PM
“The manuscript is not very good, of course. I set about to get the obnoxious pieties out of it and that proved almost impossible. I’m still working on it, and they are expecting me to not only to turn it into descent manuscript but to get them a publisher. Would you read it when I get it edited?”
Letter to publisher Robert Giroux
September 29, 1960
Page 409, The Habit of Being
June 24, 2005 at 10:15 PM
Yes. I transcribed that passage and others from her letters over on my blog, if anyone's interested.
The upshot appears to be that Sister Evangelist wrote it, then Flannery O'Connor the publishers both used "a free editorial hand" in preparing the manuscript for publication.
June 25, 2005 at 09:46 AM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
(You can use HTML tags like <b> <i> and <ul> to style your text.)
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address