« "No" | Main | On a roll »

October 02, 2005

Gather Us In

The Synod of Bishops began today, with a Mass. Proceedings begin tomorrow.


First, off, what's the Synod of Bishops?

Here's an introduction:

The Synod of Bishops is a permanent institution established by Pope Paul VI, 15 September 1965, in response to the desire of the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council to keep alive the spirit of collegiality engendered by the conciliar experience.

Literally speaking the word "synod", derived from two Greek words syn meaning "together" and hodos meaning "road" or "way", means a "coming together". A Synod is a religious meeting or assembly at which bishops, gathered around and with the Holy Father, have opportunity to interact with each other and to share information and experiences, in the common pursuit of pastoral solutions which have a universal validity and application. The Synod, generally speaking, can be defined as an assembly of bishops representing the Catholic episcopate, having the task of helping the Pope in the governing of the universal Church by rendering their counsel. Pope John Paul II has referred to the Synod as "a particularly fruitful expression and instrument of the collegiality of bishops".

There have been several since 1967, listed and described here.

Here's the Intrumentem Laboris for this Synod - the document describing the basic topics and issues that will be addressed

Here's a page bringing together all kinds of general synodal information, from the press office

Here's the introductory presentation to journalists from Saturday - logistical, explanatory stuff

And finally, here's the text of the Pope's homily today

The text, the readings of the day (linked at left, of course), focusing on the vineyard:

And thus the reading of the prophet, which we have just heard, starts as a canticle of love: God created a vineyard – an image, this, of his love story with mankind, of his love for Israel, which He chose. The first concept of the readings of today is this: in man, created in his image, God instilled the ability of loving and hence the capacity of loving also Himself, his Creator. With the canticle of love of the prophet Isaiah, God wants to talk to the heart of his people – and also to each one of us. “I created you in my image and likeness,” he tells us. “I myself am love, and you are my image to the extent that the splendour of love shines in you, to the extent that you respond to me with love”. God is waiting for us. He wants to be loved by us: should not such an appeal touch our heart? Right in this hour in which we celebrate the Eucharist, in which we launch the Synod of the Eucharist, He comes to meet us, comes to meet me. Will he find a response? Or will the same happen to us as with the vine, of which God told Isaiah: “He expected it to yield grapes, but it yielded wild grapes”? Isn’t our Christian life often more vinegar than wine? Self-pity, conflict, indifference?

Read the whole thing...and let's do and live what he exhorts the bishops to do:

We pray that the Lord gives us his grace, so that in the three weeks of the Synod which we are starting, we will not only say nice things about the Eucharist, but above all we will draw life from its power

Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/3291677

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Gather Us In:

» Devoted lip service from The Curt Jester
One of the annoying things I have find in news stories on what the Pope has said is that they... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 2, 2005 12:35:44 PM

» Devoted lip service from The Curt Jester
One of the annoying things I have find in news stories on what the Pope has said is that they... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 3, 2005 7:50:30 AM

Comments

SHAMELESS PLUG ALERT:

Benedict's comments about wild grapes reminds me of this article that appeared in my Ratzenfreude tribute.

Feeling the onset of Ratzenfreude all over again...

Posted by: Clayton at Oct 2, 2005 10:14:20 AM

"How much am I bid for this nice bunch of parsley?"

I cannot restrain sarcasm whenever I see the Asperges turned into something that looks like a Druidic rite.

Posted by: David Kubiak at Oct 2, 2005 1:10:57 PM

"Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo ..."

I'm pretty sure the author of that text (i.e., the Psalmist - I'm told that the Heb. 'zb translates as "hyssop") wasn't a Druid.

Posted by: Kevin Miller at Oct 2, 2005 2:15:38 PM

'Zis ist not St. Patrick's Day! Please remove your schtyrofoam hats in church, mine damen und herren.'

Posted by: Gerard E. at Oct 2, 2005 3:22:30 PM

+J.M.J+

"And dip a bunch of hyssop in the blood that is at the door, and sprinkle the transom of the door therewith, and both the door cheeks: let none of you go out of the door of his house till morning." Exodus 12:22 DRV

"And a man that is clean shall dip hyssop in them, and shall sprinkle therewith all the tent, and all the furniture, and the men that are defiled with touching any such thing:" Numbers 19:18 DRV

"For when every commandment of the law had been read by Moses to all the people, he took the blood of calves and goats, with water, and scarlet wool and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book itself and all the people. Saying: This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined unto you. The tabernacle also and all the vessels of the ministry, in like manner, he sprinkled with blood." Hebrews 9:19-21 DRV

Gee, I never knew Sacred Scripture was so Druidic!

(Sorry, I guess I cannot restrain sarcasm whenever I see someone being sarcastic about the Holy Father.)

In Jesu et Maria,

Posted by: Rosemarie at Oct 2, 2005 3:33:28 PM

Not sure how to turn off bold. Does this help?

Posted by: Rosemarie at Oct 2, 2005 3:34:18 PM

I hate to be snarky, but now would be a swell time to announce that Msgr. Marini has been named the Archbishop of McMurdo Sound and Primate of Antarctica.

Posted by: julian at Oct 2, 2005 5:35:55 PM

Since Msgr. Marini apparently knows his traditional Latin liturgical texts better than Prof. Kubiak ...

Posted by: Kevin Miller at Oct 2, 2005 6:50:41 PM

Mr. Miller and Rosemarie may happily join each other smearing blood on the doorposts of their local church. Perhaps they would like to sacrifice a goat, too, or a pigeon if they can only afford a smaller animal.

We have something in the Church called liturgical tradition, which is based on the idea of the development through history of stylized expressions of ritual action. To return such actions to their pre-stylized forms is to invite ridicule. Which is what the Pope is doing with that absurd bit of garnish he is brandishing about.

If people in Milwaukee or Steubenville see someone smeared with blood running down the street on Sunday banging a drum and clashing cymbals you'll know it's either the local cult of Dioynsus, or two of Ms. Welborn's enthused correspondents, who will however get a hyssop rub-down at the end of the day.

Posted by: David Kubiak at Oct 3, 2005 12:56:06 AM

David:

Except that smearing blood belongs to a particular Jewish ritual (Passover) which we no longer celebrate (except insofar as it's fulfilled by the Paschal Triduum). (Actually, that even goes too far - it belongs only to the first Passover, not to its annual celebration.)

And animal sacrifices, likewise, are celebrated only qua fulfilled in the Eucharistic sacrifice.

Finally, the use of branches to sprinkle is hardly unknown in Christian liturgical tradition, of yesterday and today. Metal sprinklers weren't exactly invented in the early Church. And furthermore, I've been to three different Eastern Churches for Theophany liturgy, two Greek Orthodox and one Melkite, and they all used branches for the sprinkling that's part of the ritual for that day (as it's the commemoration of the Baptism of the Lord).

So, try again. And try to have a sensible argument this time, besides a generalized and question-begging appeal to the nature of tradition and a few ad hominems.

Posted by: Kevin Miller at Oct 3, 2005 3:54:06 AM

" To return such actions to their pre-stylized forms is to invite ridicule. Which is what the Pope is doing with that absurd bit of garnish he is brandishing about."

From CanticaNova:
http://www.canticanova.com/articles/liturgy/art9p1.htm

"While in the East the priest uses a sort of brush for the sprinkling, and the pope uses a large sprig of hyssop (referencing Psalm 51), the usual implement for the sprinkling is the aspergillum, whose name comes from the Latin aspergere ("to sprinkle"). This has a long metal or wooden handle with a hollow metal sphere pierced with many holes. The aspergillum is dipped in the aspersorium, sometimes called aspersory, which is a metal bucket holding the holy water.

Posted by: jfbv at Oct 3, 2005 3:56:42 AM

Well, there it is. And also, it turns out from the old (pre-conciliar) Roman Ritual that hyssop was specified for other uses as well in the Latin rite, e.g., the blessing of a cornerstone for a new church.

But then, David isn't one to let either historical or theological facts get in the way of a good trad polemic.

Posted by: Kevin Miller at Oct 3, 2005 5:25:22 AM

Pride goeth before the sarcasm.

Posted by: Liam at Oct 3, 2005 7:26:46 AM

And sometimes a little bit of knowledge fudged by others. The citation by jfbv triumphantly seized upon by Mr. Miller refers to the reformed rite. The old Pontifical Mass did not have the Asperges at all, cf. Fr. Fortescue's rubrical manual. I will wait with interest for the hyssop faction to produce a pre-Novus Ordo photograph of a Pope waving this bit of vegetation. I'm sure Fr. Tucker would be happy to post it.

Posted by: David Kubiak at Oct 3, 2005 9:34:13 AM

I might add that the rubric for the consecration of churches in no way envisioned shopping at the local greengrocer for one's aspergillum. There are both Indult and SSPX pictures on the Internet that illustrate the stylization of this element that tradition had imposed.

Posted by: David Kubiak at Oct 3, 2005 9:47:25 AM

It is so sad to see that the Pope himself is so lost when it comes to tradition. But what can one expect at a "synod" that was formulated after Vatican II as, the writer leaves out, to empower the Bishops and weaken the Papacy, which it basically has with Bishops snubbing their noses at JPII when the liturgical abuses were and still are rampant and of course the worst of all, the pedophila

So this is more Vatican II hoopala in a church that will take a century to straighten out, till then my family and I head to the nearest traditional mass with traditional teachings, customs, catechisms, sacraments, and aura

God bless

Posted by: Jack at Oct 3, 2005 11:44:40 AM

Post a comment