« News Freakin' Flash | Main | Passing »

November 20, 2005

Walk the Line

Well, I went to see the Johnny Cash biopic Walk the Line Friday night, taking Katie along for the ride. (And sending her out to the bathroom as soon as I discerned the trailer for Brokeback Mountain revving up. More on that later.)

It was enjoyable, but ultimately disappointing. The reviews that to me, capture the problems with the film are those by Frederica Mathewes-Green and Owen Gleiberman in EW. What Frederica says is so true: while there is tons of music in this film...

Ray had its own strengths and flaws, but one thing it did well was thoroughly explore the nature of Ray Charles's musical genius. The neophyte viewer was led along from one stage of Charles's work to another, seeing how influences result in fresh sounds, and how combining two genres could result in something entirely original, and why that new thing might inspire both enthusiasm and resistance.

But you wouldn't know from Walk the Line what was distinctive about Cash's sound, or whether it changed and evolved, or whether it influenced others. The most we can glean comes from the 20th Century Fox promotional materials: "He was a voice of rebellion that changed the face of rock and roll. An outlaw before today's rebels were born." These unsupported assertions could have been helpfully borne out on screen.

The transition of Cash as hopeful struggling musician to touring singer with hordes of screaming girls after him is made with obviously too much edited out - it's sudden and inexplicable, and, as Frederica says, includes no real exploration of the music. Leiberman faults the film:

As a portrait of Johnny Cash the gravel-voiced country-rock innovator, who projected a private hellfire onto even his jauntiest anthems, Walk the Line is zesty and satisfying. But when it turns to the tale of how Cash, trapped in a miserable marriage, spent year after year courting, seducing, loving, yet never quite winning June Carter, the movie is on shakier ground. On the road, Cash enjoys groupies and pops amphetamines, an addiction that will land him in trouble with the law. Yet he's really a gentle soul who yearns to be loved. He and Carter begin to make eyes at each other the moment they meet backstage, and when Carter's first marriage ends, there appears to be little in the way of their getting together. But Carter, the scion of a famously traditional Christian singing family, feels guilty about her divorce, and Cash, after coercing her into performing a duet she wrote with her ex-husband, makes the mistake of giving her an onstage peck on the cheek. Horrors!

It's a downhill spiral from there. Walk the Line could turn out to be a monster chick flick, because its design is almost mythic: Saintly girl has to wait for country-rock bad boy to purge his demons and settle down. But while Witherspoon, a fine singer herself, makes Carter immensely likable, a fountain of warmth and cheer, given how sweetly she meshes with Phoe-nix her romantic reticence isn't really filled in.

That first part of the film is quite good - the opening at Folsom Prison is heart-stopping, the early life is spare and sad, and Cash's slow growth into a songwriter and performer is pretty convincing, even as it follows the convention of the music biopic, and the scenes of the Sun Records tour are just too, too brief and leave you wishing for more - the guy who plays Jerry Lee Lewis is especially great, but then...it's Jerry Lee Lewis he's playing.

I'm not a filmmaker or critic, so it's hard for me to say what could have made that middle section stronger. I just know it was ultimately dissatisfying and left us with a rather shallow portrait of Cash.

Terry Mattingly likes to talk about religion ghosts in journalism. There's a  ghost of a strong theme in Walk the Line - it's articulate early on by John's older brother, who has his eyes set on being a preacher, and, as John observes, knows his Bible impressively well. The brother shrugs and says something like, "People are going to come to me for help. If I'm gonna help them I have to know the right story to tell." It pops up again when Sam Phillips says, in a really great scene - one of my favorites in the film, that Johnny needs to imagine that he was lying in a ditch, dying...what one song would he sing to express what his life was all about? "That's the kind of song that saves people," he says. Jerry Lee Lewis alludes to it when he muses that "We're going to hell for the songs we sing.." And it's picked up again at the end, when Johnny, having gone through his drug withdrawal and told by June that God has given him a second chance, looks over his fan mail and notes how many of them are coming from the incarcerated, and, despite the objections of Columbia, the Folsom Prison concert is born. Stories to help...songs to save..that was the theme I was interested in, and that's why I wish that the film had ended with that second Folsom Prison scene, and not continued on to wrap up with Johnny's proposal to June onstage in London, Ontario. Yes, she and her family were crucial in his rehab, but I somehow think the film had been stronger if it had gone a little lighter on the June element and concentrated more on Cash's own inner life and motivation for writing, singing and living.

But...it was entertaining. I'd see it again. 'Cause I love me that Jerry Lee Lewis.

Oh...and on the Brokeback Mountain thing. Andrew Sullivan is thinking this will be a breakout, breakthrough movie. You know, B-list handsome male stars in a cowboys-in-love film. Well, after the trailer ended, in the seconds before the beginning of the next one, there was, in this full theater, a very discernible, audience-wide snicker. A guy behind me said, "I don't THINK so," evidently not moved by the sight of Heath Ledger or whoever clutching the shirt of the other guy to his shirt and weeping.

Somehow, I think King Kong might be a bigger hit.

(Just a couple more Walk the Line notes...to just prove that the power of art is in specificity and detail...beside those Sun Records tour scenes, the best scenes were a couple in which characters spoke very naturally about things important to them - the young actor portraying Johnny's older brother speaking about his interest in the Bible, then a scene where Cash and June talk the for the first time in an almost empty restaurant, about music, about his brother, "Oh..he passed" says Cash in response to June's remark that she'd sing a song for him when she sang at the Ryman. And then, in a Thanksgiving scene, there's just the briefest of exchanges between Johnny's mother (played by Shelby Lynne) and Maybelle Carter about learning to sing from shape notes, and how no one knows how to do that any more...nice stuff.)

Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451be0d69e200d83462a0af53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Walk the Line:

Comments

very nice blog very personal spiritual meditation

Posted by: John at Nov 20, 2005 2:39:48 PM

Brokeback Mountain certainly is pulling in the rave reviews (from the usual suspects, but I haven't read *any* negative reviews so far). The recent Newsweek story about it was basically a valentine to the movie. One blogger was apparently so powerfully moved after seeing it that he said something like, "I had been referring to this as the gay cowboy movie. I'll never do that again." Whatever that's supposed to mean.

The target audience, according to the producers, is supposedly gay men and straight women. They used great movie romance posters (ala Titanic) as the model for the Brokeback posters. Over and over again I keep reading about how it's really just an old-fashioned romance.

What I want to know is, will it be a date movie for straight couples? Somehow I'm doubting it.

Posted by: CV at Nov 20, 2005 2:44:00 PM

Brokeback Mountain: Like the "gay marriage" issue, this sort of thing has a lot to do with self-esteem and "validation" -- which, when you think about it, is kind of an insulting posture. (Am I wrong, but a similar -- if not same -- posture is insisted-upon by the more shrill feminists toward women?)

Walk the Line: sounds good; I'll see it. Maybe I'm wrong, but Johnny Cash struck me as a basically decent person who lost, and later found, his way; and who tried and succeeded in doing some good in his life and work.

Posted by: (Fr) Septimus at Nov 20, 2005 2:47:31 PM

My first memory of Johnny Cash is from when I was about eight or nine years old. We had just gotten out of services from the evangelical church my family attended in a town in Southeastern Oregon. As my family lived 25 miles from the church, we would always have brunch at a nearby cafe afterwards. On the way into the cafe I saw a poster with an imposing looking figure in a black trenchcoat. Above the picture was one word- CASH. The poster was an ad for a concert that would be happening at the local airbase (this was still a few years before his career would be reignited with American Recordings.) I asked my parents if we could go but to no avail. That was my first and only chance to see him in person and I have always regretted that it didn't work out. I was about 14 when his first record with American was released. I was immediatly hooked. Within a couple years I had nearly all his recordings. My senior project to graduate from high school was on the Sun recording artists- esp Cash and Carl Perkins. Every morning I would wake up my poor little sister with "Live at Folson Prison" blaring. So...yeah..I'm a Cash junkie. Given this obsession I was nervous about the upcoming movie. All my fears were unfounded. Pheonix seemed to work into the role slowly. In the begining of the film his acting was somewhat like the attempts of his character at singing- shakey and unsure. By the end of the movie he was completely convincing. There were times, esp on stage under the spotlight, that I had to remind myself I wasn't actually watching Johnny Cash perform (that isn't to say that Pheonix's vocals were perfect, but they were not bad enough to be distracting. What was convincing was his mannerisms and his stage presence) Reese Witherspoon nailed her part from the begining. She was wonderful. I have to disagree with Amy as to the middle section of the movie. I think what happened at Sun records was somewhat sudden and inexplicable- at least thats what former Sun recording artists have said (Carl Perkins' and Johnny Cash's autobiographies are helpful in this regard.) These guys went from total obscurity to driving around the country perfoming for sold out audiences, popping pills, and wrecking cadillacs in the blink of an eye. It tooks its toll on all of them- Cash, Orbison, and Perkins would be the only ones who came out of it all with relatively normal lives; and that usually after a couple decades. Anyway, this post is already too long. If you havn't seen the movie go see it.

Posted by: anonymous seminarian at Nov 20, 2005 3:23:28 PM

I know this crowd is in the I-don't-THINK-so camp for the idea that two men might honestly love one another, as in "Brokeback Mountain," but I recommend the Annie Proulx novella, at least. Very powerful.

Posted by: Nance at Nov 20, 2005 3:28:00 PM

Nance:

People's reactions are people's reactions. You have yours and others have theirs. Oh well.

Posted by: amy at Nov 20, 2005 3:56:35 PM

And Nance....I am fully open to what you say. However, this trailer was...amusing. The leads just don't seem to carry it off, even in this brief trailer. Remember, I was a 6FU fan, even though I could never buy that relationship either, mostly because I think the guy who played Keith was not a great actor. I have to honestly say that the sight of Heath Ledger (or whichever one it was) clutching a woman's shirt to his breast and weeping probably would have evoked snickers as well.

Posted by: amy at Nov 20, 2005 3:59:59 PM

Huh. I watched the same trailer and had a different reaction. You really can't tell from a trailer, but it made me want to see the movie, at least. (Note: I'm predisposed to like Ang Lee films.) My friend the film critic reported that when he saw it in Toronto, grown men were sobbing in their seats when the lights came up. He said the film's real message is, no matter who you are, no matter where you hide, love can still find you. I really don't know why people get so bothered by such an idea, but there you are.

Posted by: Nance at Nov 20, 2005 4:07:28 PM

I'm buying Heath Ledger in that part because, in the book at least, the character is almost pathologically taciturn, and he seems to have that part covered. The shirt scene comes at the very end of the story and is the only point at which his character, Ennis, is able to acknowlege strong feelings with any reaction other than a punch to the jaw or other violence. Just reading it made me cry, but what do I know?

Part of the story's power is the way it acknowledges how circumscribed these lives were. It takes place over a 20-year period beginning in 1964 in the most remote corner of a pretty remote state. The very idea of being homosexual -- or even admitting it to yourself -- in such an environment was simply anathema, and by the end of that period, it wasn't much easier, at least for the Ledger character.

People can snicker if they want, but I'm going to give it a chance.

Posted by: Nance at Nov 20, 2005 4:19:42 PM

Nance,
I'm less bothered by the idea that two men could fall deeply in love (of course that can and does happen and will continue to happen) than by the consequences of physically expressing that love...which is of course the whole issue in a nutshell. And there are profound consequences...for individuals, for families, for the human race in general. It's the latter that "bothers" me, if you want to put it that way.

No question, it's a hard teaching (meaning the Church's position on homosexual behavior). No serious person would disagree that it is easy for anyone who experiences same-sex attraction to attempt live out that teaching, especially in today's culture. But that doesn't mean that it's not the truth.

In light of that, it's really a little simplistic to reduce objections to this film to some people getting "bothered" about seeing it depicted on film.

But of course, feel free to generalize about those who comment here as you generally do....

Posted by: CV at Nov 20, 2005 4:32:50 PM

I saw the trailer for Brokeback Mountain in Washington DC (Georgetown, to be exact) and I can assure you that there were no giggles from the peanut gallery. The movie might well be bad (it certainly doesn't get my interest) but what's the point in defending a bunch of homophobic jocks shouting around a movie theater?

Posted by: Tony A at Nov 20, 2005 4:38:25 PM

CV et.al. Of course there are consequences to physically expressing homosexual love...and adulterous love...and premarital love. From the wee bit I've read and the trailer for Brokeback Mountain it doesn't appear that the very real consequences of destroyed lives, broken hearts, devastated families are ignored. And I agree that to just object to this film because a reality is shown is simplistic. It isn't one I'd have liked a young girl (or boy) to see the trailer for, but several films that have turned out to be classic could fall into that category. And it may be a simply wretched film.

Posted by: Radactrice at Nov 20, 2005 5:55:08 PM

Radatrice,
I agree, but I'd just point out that the overwhelming impression I'm taking away from reviews of Brokeback Mountain is the focus on the love story, not the impact on the families involved.

We'll hear lots more (especially at Oscar time) about grown men crying after seeing the film, and about how "validated" the story makes them feel. In the end, it's all about normalizing gay relationships, whether it's a wretched film or a brilliant film (artistically speaking).

Posted by: pacatholic at Nov 20, 2005 6:14:22 PM

Why do you assume that the audience snickering was made up of "homophobic jocks"? I would assume a Johnny Cash movie would draw about equal parts men and women.

(I would also assume the vast majority of those watching a Johnny Cash movie wouldn't be even vaguely interested in Brokeback Mountain, so I'm a bit surprised the movie company even bothered running it.)

Nevertheless, I do expect Brokeback Mountain to do okay business, mostly because there's a lot of women and young girls who find two cute guys together to be titillating. (Hence the entire fanfic genre of slash. Hence the entire anime genre of yaoi, which basically amounts to prettier, happier, mushier versions of exploitation flicks that are written for Japanese girls.)

To me, Brokeback Mountain sounds like typical women's emoporn about gay guys, albeit directed by Ang Lee. Quite aside from any moral qualms, you couldn't make me go to a movie like that if you paid me. If I were a gay guy, I'd feel exploited.

Posted by: Maureen at Nov 20, 2005 6:26:09 PM

BROKEBACK MUNTAIN is exactly the sort of thing to take the Oscar if MUNICH falls short. I don't intend to see either one.

Posted by: Sandra Miesel at Nov 20, 2005 9:13:55 PM

If one of the characters in that movie (the "gay cowboy movie") were to exchange his Stetson for a miter, you could subtitle it: the saga of Bishop Gene Robinson!

I am going to have to agree with CV's comments above. It would be irresponsible to reduce the content of the movie to a simple love story. It is quite clearly propoganda from the same folks who brought us the "Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence" ie. the gay rights movement. I would be curious to read what someone like David Morrison might contribute to this discussion. (David, if you are reading, please give your two cents)

Posted by: Fr. Totton at Nov 20, 2005 9:51:26 PM

I wish the discussion of the Cash movie hadn't been sidetracked by the Gay Cowboy Movie. Gee, it was taken seriously in Georgetown?
I predict a box office flop.
About Cash: my earliest musical memory was hearing "Ring of Fire" and "Walk the Line"; my dad -who looked like Johnny Cash, actually, was a big fan.
Later, in the 60s, when my dad and I were on opposite ends of the cultural clash, Johnny Cash sang a song called "The Lonely Voice of Youth", which was sympathetic to Poor Lost Youth, and then recorded an album with Bob Dylan, which bewildered my dear dad and greatly pleased me.
I am, however, hesitant to see the film.
Mr. Cash was a complex fellow, and his love for Ms. Carter was adulterous, and I am not sure I want to confront the whole thing, let alone be manipulated into sympathy for sin...

Posted by: Daniel Nichols at Nov 20, 2005 10:08:40 PM

Just so you know, only the very final trailer before the movie is attached to the movie. The rest of the trailers are up to the individual theaters to play or not play. I saw Walk the Line today and it did not show the Brokeback Mountain trailer--my husband works at the theater and knows what the procedure is. If your theater showed the trailer, it was because they thought it would be a good film for their location.

I really enjoyed the movie, though I thought it left the viewer with a bad impression of Cash, unredeemed by any possible later good works.

Posted by: Misty at Nov 20, 2005 10:38:26 PM

Fr Totton writes:
"If one of the characters in that movie (the "gay cowboy movie") were to exchange his Stetson for a miter, you could subtitle it: the saga of Bishop Gene Robinson!"

...or the Saga of Anthony O'Connell, Rembert Weakland, Keith Symons, Joseph Hart, Tom Dupre, Daniel Ryan, Patrick Ziemann, Kendrick Williams, Robert Lynch, et al

The Episcopal Church has hardly cornered the market on bishops pursuing an 'alternative lifestyle'.

Posted by: Richard the Adequate at Nov 20, 2005 10:41:11 PM

Well, the "reigning protocols" will force most critics to give Brokeback Mountain rave reviews, whether it deserves it or not. The concept bores me (two good looking cowpokes pining for each other). I'll take "The Crying Game" for forbidden love and good film making. Here, while genuine affection exists between Jimmy/Fergus and Dil, the boundaries of physical expression are observed. The subject is treated with sympathy and humor but, in the end, things by necessity remain chaste. As the man says, "It's in [their} nature".

Posted by: Frank Gibbons at Nov 20, 2005 10:48:13 PM

If this thread is moving off Johnny Cash to other movies, has anyone seen the newest Harry Potter?

Posted by: Radactrice at Nov 20, 2005 11:02:45 PM

Radatrice: Oh, I have! 'HP and the Goblet of Fire' It's the best of the series so far, very entertaining and with impeccably wonderful special effects. I definitely would see it again!

Posted by: Veronica at Nov 20, 2005 11:18:41 PM

"Nevertheless, I do expect Brokeback Mountain to do okay business, mostly because there's a lot of women and young girls who find two cute guys together to be titillating. (Hence the entire fanfic genre of slash. Hence the entire anime genre of yaoi, which basically amounts to prettier, happier, mushier versions of exploitation flicks that are written for Japanese girls.)"

As an anime fan, I have always wondered why some females are attracted by yaoi stories. I find them absolutely repulsive, no matter how 'handsome' the guys are or how 'cute and sweet' their romance is supposed to be. It just leaves me confused, and I do wonder about the mental state of the girls who can find the idea of 2 guys together to be attractive. I guess I just can't get it.

I do agree though, that 'Brokeback Mountain' will do okay, thanks to women like these... sheesh.

Posted by: Veronica at Nov 20, 2005 11:26:22 PM

Yeah...the yaoi stuff certainly looked baseless when you look at the original series. However, the rabid insistence of many of these yaoi writers that their crap is in keeping with anime "canon", nearly ruined some fine anime work for me, most notably "Gundam Wing".

As for girls who find two guys attractive, I firmly believe they are dwarfed in number by guys with the opposite taste...they just tend to write in bulk. :P Of all my female friends, I know of only one who was marginally attracted to the concept. On the other hand...most of my male friends on the concept of two girls...oi.....

Humanity is wierd.

Posted by: JonathanR. at Nov 21, 2005 1:13:48 AM

"Yeah...the yaoi stuff certainly looked baseless when you look at the original series. However, the rabid insistence of many of these yaoi writers that their crap is in keeping with anime "canon", nearly ruined some fine anime work for me, most notably "Gundam Wing".

How absolutely true. Actually, the huge amount of yaoi fandom that series had, kept me from seeing this anime for a long time, thinking it was all about guys falling in love with one another. When I actually watched Gundam Wing, however, I was pleasantly surprised. There is simply NO homosexual implications there at all... in fact the implied romance between Heero and Relena was more than obvious. Like I said in my previous post, I do wonder about the mental state of the girls who like yaoi, and those who swear that the GW guys (and other characters from other series) are gay simply because they happen to talk to other guys sometimes. Are they dellusional, I wonder?

Some of them are downright sick... like those who pair off two guys even if they are brothers, like in FullMetal Alchemist. Some yaoi fans do need to see a psichologist, I think.


Posted by: Veronica at Nov 21, 2005 1:51:30 AM

Post a comment