« The CBS Pope movie | Main | Forget the ashes on the football field »
December 05, 2005
Closed for Christmas
Wal-Mart?
CVS?
Publix?
Nah...it's your local megachurch.
Central Kentucky's largest church will break with tradition and close its doors on Christmas Sunday so that staff and volunteers can spend more time with their families.
Southland Christian Church near Lexington, where more than 7,000 people worship each week, is one of several evangelical megachurches across the country that are opting to cancel services on one of the holiest days on the Christian calendar.
Supporters say the change is family-friendly. Opponents call it a regrettable bow to secular culture.
The list of closed congregations on Christmas Sunday reads like a who's who of evangelical Protestantism: Willow Creek Community Church, the Chicago area's largest congregation; Mars Hill Bible Church in Grandville, Mich.; North Point Community Church in Alpharetta, Ga.; and Fellowship Church near Dallas.
The churches, which rank among the largest congregations in America, will hold multiple Christmas Eve services instead.
Megachurch officials around the country consulted with each other before deciding to take the day off.
The decision makes sense in today's hectic world, said Willow Creek spokeswoman Cally Parkinson. "It's more than being family-friendly. It's being lifestyle-friendly for people who are just very, very busy," she said.
Many evangelical churches don't hold Christmas day services, except when the holiday falls on a Sunday.
For some evangelicals, it's the day of the week -- not the day of the year -- that's sacred. To them, closing the doors of the church on the Lord's Day is unthinkable.
Others, troubled by the holiday's increasingly secular tone, lament the change.
While admiring the emphasis on family, Fuller Theological Seminary professor Robert K. Johnston worries that another Christian tradition is fading. Fuller, in Pasadena, Calif., is one of the nation's premier evangelical schools.
"What's going on here is a redefinition of Christmas as a time of family celebration rather than as a time of the community faithful celebrating the birth of the savior," said Johnston, a professor of theology and culture. "There is a risk that we will lose one more of our Christian rituals, one that's at the heart of our faith."
Context, please:
Half of my family is Protestant- rather low-church southern Methodist. When I was growing up, it never crossed any of their minds to go to church on Christmas unless, as the piece notes, it fell on a Sunday. (The fact that it does fall on a Sunday this year makes this closing kind of odd, though) In fact, I don't think their churches had Christmas services (early 60's - 70's). Growing up, for the most part, in the South, it was clear even to me that it really wasn't until the 80's or so that low-church Protestants (which would include evangelicals) started having Christmas services, and most of those were pageants and musicals. More than a few Catholic Churches in the south were often packed at Christmas, especially Midnight Mass, not just because of twice-a-year Catholics, but because of Protestants looking for somewhere to go to church, something their spiritual instincts told them they should do.
Most fascinating, this push and pull that some American evangelicals are experiencing between their own spiritual sensibilities, American culture, and the deep river of Christian tradition.
And of course, in the comments, Zhou reminds us of the Puritan-rooted association of liturgical markings of Christmas with pagan-saturated Catholicism. But that would also apply to Christmas trees and such, which I presume are not being neglected by these folks. But still, there is that suspicion.
Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451be0d69e200d8345ac18669e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Closed for Christmas:
» Open at Christmas! from 42
This: open book: Closed for Christmas comes into the I don't believe it category. [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 5, 2005 10:22:43 PM
» Christmas vs. December Twenty-Fifth from Ales Rarus
What can be said that hasn't been said, indeed? Leave it to me to try...
Shutting church doors for Christmas is a perfectly natural and predictable byproduct of a church who fails to see itself as the Church, i.e., as offering for the faithful somet... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 7, 2005 9:24:15 AM
» This blog will be closed in observance of Christmas Day from inedibleink.com
so that readers, (management and the vast, award*-winning editorial and writing staffs) can go to church with their families.
Originally uploaded by Captoe sign with help from ChurchSignGenerator.com.
The Daily Eudemon ... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 23, 2005 1:59:32 AM
Comments
Well, that about wraps it up for American megachurch Christianity.
OTOH, this is a wonderful opportunity for other churches.... :)
Posted by: Maureen at Dec 5, 2005 12:12:54 PM
I was raised Protestant and it also was rare for us to go to church on Christmas day (even if it was on Sunday). Not sure if that is "official" or not, but it is sort of a Protestant thing in general to decide whether to attend church on a Sunday even if it isn't Christmas. I think the Sunday obligation is a very Catholic thing, not part of Protestant culture or teachings (keep the day holy, yes...attend church, maybe).
The part that I found interesting was the implication that going to church is not "family-oriented" or family friendly. That speaks volumes about the mega-church idea. Something which should be discussed as an entirely seperate issue from the goings on at 1st Baptist church down the street.
Posted by: Other Marc at Dec 5, 2005 12:22:32 PM
Here in Tennessee, a Baptist friend has been meeting our family for midnight Mass for the past four years because her mega-church doesn't have services on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day.
Posted by: TNP at Dec 5, 2005 12:31:19 PM
This is a revelation to me. I am Protestant, and I've never been involved with a church that did not conduct Sunday services on Christmas Day, when Christmas Day happened to be a Sunday. (On the other hand, I've never been to one of the "megachurches," either, and have no knowledge of their practices.)
Always seemed to me like kind of a special treat, when Christmas fell on a Sunday.
Very strange.
Posted by: Bartleby at Dec 5, 2005 12:31:27 PM
This seems like a more relevant "war on Christmas" than what particular greeting any never-quite-specified salesclerk at any given retail store supposedly-but-never-quite-confirmed can or can't wish you.
Posted by: ajb at Dec 5, 2005 12:50:18 PM
I can understand that this is "shocking!" and a sign of the end of the world for Catholics and "liturgical" Protestant types like Episcopaleans and Lutherans.
But in my evangelical, Protestant church we never celebrated Christmas at all. It received a theological, historical grade of P for pagan. The fact that Catholics and "almost Catholic" Protestant churches celebrated Christmas only proved their apostasy.
For those who are interested, there is ample material to be found by Google concerning all the arguments against Christmas in general and Christmas on December 25 in particular.
Which is not to say that the Incarnation of Christ is not significant in the evangelical, Protestant churches. Of course it is. It is the coming of the God-man, our big brother who opens the way for us to be divinized, joining divinity to our humanity, rescuing us from the Fall, and leading us into glory. All this has very little to do with the winter solstice, decorated trees, exchanging presents, or department store sales.
Posted by: Old Zhou at Dec 5, 2005 12:50:18 PM
We should start a campaign to keep the "mass" in Christmas!
Posted by: John J. Simmins at Dec 5, 2005 12:53:10 PM
Many Catholic parishes go in the same direction regarding Christmas day Masses. In my last parish we had three Masses Christmas Eve that were packed full and one Mass on Christmas day that was perhaps 3/4 full. It seems like the norm as I listen to other pastors.
Posted by: frsteven at Dec 5, 2005 12:53:23 PM
Are they also, then, going to close on Easter Sunday, to allow for more familytogetherness hunting chocolate eggs and lining up at the local eatery for Easter brunch?
Posted by: SouthCoast at Dec 5, 2005 12:54:22 PM
Knowing how many more people that it takes to put on one of the mega-church services, I can understand their reasoning. BUT, it still horrifies me.
They could just cut back on the number of services and/or have more on Saturday evening.
Posted by: Anna at Dec 5, 2005 12:56:51 PM
Well, South Coast,
Since you mentioned the "other" big day for "Christmas and Easter" Catholics, in my evangelical, Protestant church we never celebrated Easter at all, either. It received a theological, historical grade of P for pagan. The fact that Catholics and "almost Catholic" Protestant churches celebrated Easter only proved their apostasy (just like Christmas).
For those who are interested, there is ample material to be found by Google concerning all the arguments against Easter as celebrated (eggs, bunny, fertility icons, Vernal equinox, etc).
Which is not to say that the Resurrection of Christ is not significant in the evangelical, Protestant churches. Of course it is. It is the coming of the new creation, the birth of the Church, the victory our big brother over death, joining us to himself and making us one in Him. All this has very little to do with the eggs, bunnies, chocolate, pretty dresses and hats, the Jewish calendar or Spring.
Is not every Sunday the celebration of the Lord's resurrection? Are we not called to live the new creation every day?
This business of Christmas and Easter touches on a larger difference of faith communities. There are perfectly happy communities which are non-liturgical and do not use any sort of liturgical calendar beyond "The Lord's Day" every Sunday. That is all.
Posted by: Old Zhou at Dec 5, 2005 1:00:42 PM
Growing up as a Unitarian-Universalist (in New England where the denominations historical roots are in the Puritan churches) (now Catholic) we didn't have Christmas day services, but we did have Christmas Eve services.
Posted by: Samuel J. Howard at Dec 5, 2005 1:03:23 PM
I live in Lexington, and so I am familiar with Southland. I find it laughable that they would not have services on Christmas....But I think it speaks to the fact that evangelicals lack a liturgical calendar and that this lack is very felt (proven by the those mentioned in the article who go to Catholic Masses at Christmas, and also by my own personal aquaintances who do the same). My friends and I (I got to UK) are quite familiar with Southland's feel good theology.
Posted by: Anne at Dec 5, 2005 1:04:23 PM
(of course the Puritans felt like Zhou's former evangelical bretheren about Christmas.)
Posted by: Samuel J. Howard at Dec 5, 2005 1:05:06 PM
Like Zhou, my husband grew up in a denomination that eschewed the evil Pagan-Catholic Christmas, but apparently encouraged a secular, family-based celebration at home. This struck me as extremely weird when he told me about it--religious Christmas bad, secular Christmas good--but the presents-and-dinner Christmas at home is still an extremely important thing to him. So we go to Midnight Mass, and spend Christmas Day doing the secular thing at his parents' house. Works for everyone so far.
Zhou, did your childhood church allow/encourage the secular Christmas too? Or was this just my dh's family's particular branch of the CoC?
Posted by: sharon d. at Dec 5, 2005 1:10:48 PM
A bit of self-revelation....you may skip this if you are not curious about my own peculiar journey of faith....
My wife and I have never had a Christmas tree. Never. Not one. Not as evangelical, Protestants (remember, our home was used for ministry, and a tree would never have been allowed...), nor even as Catholics. Not even an artificial one. Now, since we have come back to the Catholic Church, we do have a joyful nativity scene in our home, and we send Christmas cards to friends (about half of them bishops, abbots, priests and religious), and we have an advent wreath. We go to midnight Christmas Mass at a local parish (varying each year).
But that is about it for "special" Christmas stuff with us. I don't have much appetite for "secular" Christmas stuff like office parties. And we don't have a television, and hardly listen to radio, so we don't get bombarded with the marketplace Christmas.
As we pray the Liturgy of the Hours all year, we do use the volume I for Advent and Christmas, and at the monastery we chant different antiphons and psalms. But I consider this just part of our living and praying through the Church's liturgical calendar all year long, and not anything "special" or "Christmas-y." It is just regualar life for us, celebrating, loving and contemplating Christ in the season when the Church focuses on his Incarnation.
Posted by: Old Zhou at Dec 5, 2005 1:18:52 PM
In response to Sharon D.'s question: all celebration of Christmas was considered apostate in our Church. No religious Christmas. No participation in secular Christmas events (no sending of cards, no parties). No Christmas decorations or clothing. No family traditions of Christmas.
This last bit did cause some conflicts for new converts, but it was a price they willingly paid, a cross to bear, to shake off the blindness of apostate religion mixed with paganism.
Now, today I will tell you that it was just a little bit extreme. But it is still rather tense when we visit with my wife's family (still in that church) and we have to be discrete about not mentioning Christmas very much when we are at their house on December 25.
Now, a great contradiction is that they are anti-Christmas and Easter for reasons of "purifying" their Christian religion; but they have no objections to contraception. Seems a bit like straining out the gnats and swallowing the camels; but don't get me started. I'm not there anymore.
Posted by: Old Zhou at Dec 5, 2005 1:26:33 PM
'Which is not to say that the Incarnation of Christ is not significant in the evangelical, Protestant churches. Of course it is. It is the coming of the God-man, our big brother who opens the way for us to be divinized, joining divinity to our humanity, rescuing us from the Fall, and leading us into glory. All this has very little to do with the winter solstice, decorated trees, exchanging presents, or department store sales.'
The Incarnation may have very little to do with trees, presents and all that jazz but it should have something to do with the communal celebration and contemplation of this Mystery of the faith--which is why the closing of churches and the failure to mark the day in a religous (rather than commercial) manner is a mystery to this very simple-minded Christian.
Posted by: reluctant penitent at Dec 5, 2005 1:36:36 PM
Just some background, from The History Channel:
An Outlaw Christmas
In the early 17th century, a wave of religious reform changed the way Christmas was celebrated in Europe. When Oliver Cromwell and his Puritan forces took over England in 1645, they vowed to rid England of decadence and, as part of their effort, cancelled Christmas.
...The pilgrims, English separatists that came to America in 1620, were even more orthodox in their Puritan beliefs than Cromwell. As a result, Christmas was not a holiday in early America. From 1659 to 1681, the celebration of Christmas was actually outlawed in Boston. Anyone exhibiting the Christmas spirit was fined five shillings.
...Christmas wasn't declared a federal holiday until June 26, 1870.
Posted by: Old Zhou at Dec 5, 2005 1:41:39 PM
'When Oliver Cromwell and his Puritan forces took over England in 1645, they vowed to rid England of decadence and, as part of their effort, cancelled Christmas.'
What do these people have in common: Cromwell and the Puritans, the White Witch, the Grinch? Just asking.
Posted by: reluctant penitent at Dec 5, 2005 1:49:01 PM
But Zhou, don't you put out straw for the Three Kings, or shoes/stockings for St. Nicholas? Celebrate Childermas by doing stuff for the poor aborted babies? Make St. Lucy's cakes? Do anything holidayish for the holy day?
I mean, you don't have to copy the blend of German and English culture that characterizes the usual American Christmas customs. But you ought to have some manner of saintly and holidayish fun, even if you have to make up something consonant with your ethnic background and preferences in fun. Otherwise, you're missing half the fun and traditional devotion of being Catholic. Which, for a trad-flavored Catholic, is a lot sadder than for a liberal or moderate one.
Even if your religious style is austere, you can still do something feasty and festive for the holy days and seasons.
Maureen, just so sad about this!
Posted by: Maureen at Dec 5, 2005 2:06:02 PM
If our priest married, would we have to cancel Christmas Mass because they wanted to stay home with the kids and open presents?
Posted by: Epovick at Dec 5, 2005 2:10:13 PM
Well, Maureen, my wife does insist that we watch a DVD of A Christmas Story on the computer. We love how it ends in a Chinese restaurant.
"Fa ra ra ra ra, ra ra ra ra." Whack!
Posted by: Old Zhou at Dec 5, 2005 2:10:21 PM
Zhou, sometimes you just too "precious" for words and this is one of the times.
Christmas wasn't a holiday in heavily WASP Indiana until it became a Federal holiday. Easter celebrations were viewed with suspicion in many Protestant churches in the US until the late 19th C. Leigh Schmidt, author of that new "I'm spiritual, not religious" book wrote an interesting study on the evolution of major American holidays, CONSUMER RITES.
Posted by: Sandra Miesel at Dec 5, 2005 2:14:14 PM
My Catholic friends in Louisville lovingly call that church Six Flags over Jesus. Don't you love that name!!!!!
Posted by: Maggie at Dec 5, 2005 2:27:22 PM



















