« One Year with Benedict | Main | Dissent at Notre Dame »

April 19, 2006

One year later

NEW YORK TIMES READERS:

Welcome!

This your perpipatetic blogger's old blog. Before the new blog. Which is now here.

Back to business:


That day a year ago is impossible to forget. It was thrilling and mystifying. Why were we all so fascinated, even the secular media? I was watching one of the nets and an anchor said, "I'm getting chills" - it's sobering, really, to think about it - that the election of a Pope could produce so much interest in what we thought was such a cynical world.

What was it? The drama was hard to miss, and impossible not to be affected by. A vote, totally in secret, with no exit polls and not a hint of what was happening, by a small group gathered in a chapel in which they Creation and Fall arches above them and the Last Judgment looms above them - as our tour guide in the Sistine Chapel told us, when Michelangelo painted the Last Judgment, no one thought anyone except clerics - the highest clerics in the Church- would ever see it. It was intended for them: Listen to the Lord. Put your own interests aside. There is a great deal at stake here.

And face it: we're talking about the longest-lasting institution in the world, aren't we? Governments, movements, cultures and even empires have come and gone, but the Church has remained, with Peter and his successors at the heart of it, symbolizing unity and continuity.

The drama. The history. The question of who could follow John Paul?

Then came the smoke, and the uncertainty as to its color. Long, long minutes of confusion, and then finally we knew. How did we know? Because of the bells, rung to confirm the vote. Habemus Papam.

Then, most thrilling to me were the people. Streaming into St. Peter's in response to the bells, just as Christians had ordered their lives according to the bells for centuries. They rushed from all over Rome, in this scene that evoked ancient times: they came, not to listen to a radio or watch a film or check the internet - but to glue their eyes to a balcony and see who came out.

And do you remember the announcement? Cardinal Jorge Medina Estevez - the "Cardinale - Ratzinger!" with a lovely, memorable, rolling of that "r."

(Want to relive it? Here's a CNN page with video and audio from that day)

More photos of the day here, from the very excellent site devoted to the history of St. Peter's Basilica

And after a year...what?

I'm actually reluctant to offer an "assessment" of Pope Benedict's first year because it strikes me as awfully presumptuous. Who the heck am I?

So that's not what this is. It's an appreciation.

I will admit to you - no surprise to readers of this blog - that I do love Pope Benedict. I knew next to nothing about Cardinal Ratzinger, only a few of his writings and the assurance that he was unfairly maligned by his enemies and critics.  But in the year since, I have become - odd for me - devoted.

I worry about this sometimes, my feelings echoed in a comment made by someone here a week or so ago. The reader commented that she worried about herself. Was she becoming a "papalotrist?" Was she too attached to Benedict ? Because she couldn't help herself - she was intrigued by practically everything he said.

No, I really don't worry. That was a joke. Sort of.  But like that commentor, I am thoroughly engaged by Benedict's teaching. It is clear, rich and, most importantly and amazingly to me - speaks with precision to the moment at hand. Every moment is a teachable moment for Benedict, and he gets it all - the yearnings and hurts that human beings in the 21st century are enduring, the context in which we live, and the answers Jesus Christ offers.

In a way, he is the teacher I've been waiting for. He's the teacher I can attempt, faintly, to model myself after.

There are enormous problems in our Church and in our world. Some of us wish there would simply be some concerted head-knocking to take care of it all. But Benedict knows history, and he also knows what is at the heart of our problems: we have turned from Christ. Even in our Church, our fundamental problem is that too many of us have argued ourself out of serious, commmitted belief in Jesus Christ, modulating and contextualizing it to the point of emptiness. Too many of us have put ourselves at the center of this enterprise rather than Christ. Too many of us have simply sold out to whatever culture that surrounds us, letting it be our Lord, not Jesus Christ.

 

I have no great statements about his impact on the Curia or the bishops' conferences or liturgical life or diplomacy. What I have heard over and over this year is a wise father gently, surely re-grounding us in Scripture and the witness there, as well as in the voices and art and holiness of Christians through the ages, articulating what we know is true about the strains, temptations and deserts in our lives, weaving it all together and in rather startling simplicity, pointing us to Jesus.

Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451be0d69e200d83435282153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference One year later:

» The Rookie Year from The American Princess
Happy Anniversary, Pope Benedict! Amy Welborn has a rundown.... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 19, 2006 7:24:23 PM

Comments

Yes, indeed! I DID know Ratzinger and I remember telling my friends that if I had been able to pick any human being on earth to be Pope, it would Joseph Ratzinger.

I remember writing in the first hours to all my friends, saying that he was a good, kind, holy, wise man. That he loved God and he loved people. That he was no Rottweiler or disciplinarian. That he loved the past, but he knew we couldn't return to it and that those who thought he would be a Pius XIII just had him wrong and would be terribly disappointed. And that he would be an even greater preacher than John Paul the Second.

So, I see what I expected to see. And like Amy Welborn, I am very pleased. I trust Joseph Ratzinger more than I trust myself on just about any issue I can name. Let's pray that he will stay healthy and stay with us for many years to come.

Posted by: Jeff at Apr 19, 2006 1:18:17 AM

Thanks, Amy. This captures something of my own response to the man.

Posted by: Lickona at Apr 19, 2006 1:26:59 AM

With the John Paul II funeral homily and the homily at the inauguration, Joseph Ratzinger captured hearts and minds all over the world. His teaching is so eloquent and rich and pitch perfect that anyone who listens to him or reads his words or sees him in action can't help but be enthralled, regardless of age, education or culture. And, yes, he's going back to basics, reminding Christians of the cornerstone of our faith: love of Jesus. The encyclical and the Compendium of the Catechism appear to be companion works that Benedict wants to use to get Catholics to understand why and what the Church believes. Furthermore, because he isn't as theatrical a personality as Pope John Paul, the "dramatic" gestures he does make have great impact. I, for one, was awestruck at his prostration at the beginning of Good Friday services and thought it telling that he chose to do that, while he did not kiss the tarmac upon arriving in Germany. Like Jeff, I pray every day that the Lord grant him days enough to shepherd His wayward flock.

Posted by: rcesq at Apr 19, 2006 2:16:35 AM

Confession: I remember my first reaction was mild disappointment. It seemed too predictable, too, dare I say, preordained. I was hoping the Holy Spirit would surprise us, hand us a curveball of a pope. A year later, I must say, though the conclave did not surprise me, the Holy Spirit has certainly made good with the man. It really is uncanny how Benedict's got the Midas Mouth - everything that comes out of it is gold. Meanwhile, we're being force-fed a steady diet of all these Foot-in-the-Mouths on TV, the radio, and worst of all, the pulpit. Long live Benedict!

Posted by: L.T. at Apr 19, 2006 2:33:04 AM

Is there one website that collects all of B16's papal writings and pronouncements? I don't mean encyclicals (although that wouldn't hurt!), just the things that Amy provides excerpts from. Maybe that's a stupid question for a reader of this blog ...

Thanks --

Posted by: MJ at Apr 19, 2006 6:50:06 AM

Amy, very well said.

Posted by: Mary Kay at Apr 19, 2006 7:24:12 AM

I was at school, with a group of priests and nuns, many of whom were, shall we say, displeased with the election. At the announcement of the name, there was a pregnant pause. I promised myself not to whoop for joy, but I simply and honestly could not contain myself. I let out a whoop and ran down the hall to my room to call my parents.
I had been a fan of Ratzinger for many years, at least since reading the Ratzinger Report - but it was his theological readings that kept me fascinated with this man: so deep and so human. When he describes the Corpus Christi celebrations in the Bavaria of his childhood I still get chills. As Amy says (more beautifully than I could hope) he's a teacher - the teacher I have admired half a lifetime, and can't wait to hear what he teaches us next. Ad multos annos, Papa!!!

Posted by: Tim Ferguson at Apr 19, 2006 7:36:19 AM

Amy you captured my feelings so well...and I would only add Praise be to God!

Posted by: Maria Ashwell at Apr 19, 2006 8:36:24 AM

Well said! I don't know if it's age or maturity, but I find myself drawn to and engaged by Pope Benedict in a manner I never experienced with Pope John Paul II (for whom my esteem and respect are great). I have this affection for Benedict that walks right up to the line of sentimentality.

Our new pope has been a great inspiration (and I choose that word carefully) to my faith. What a gift of the Spirit is this gentle, loving, and brilliant shepherd.

Posted by: Shane MacGowan's Teeth at Apr 19, 2006 8:46:51 AM

I, too, was quite pleased to hear of his election to the papacy. I knew some of his writings while working under JPII.

I have to admit, however, that I'm still torn. I miss JPII very much, his personality, his traveling, his style, his love, his outgoing nature and desire that all would come into the fold. . . Sometimes I feel a little guilty that I have not moved on as fully as it seems some others have. Glad for Benedict the XVI, just miss John Paul II.

Posted by: TCYM Lounge at Apr 19, 2006 8:56:34 AM

Best combox pseudonym ever!

Posted by: Charles at Apr 19, 2006 8:58:39 AM

I'm 21, and I guess at the end of what people would consider the "JP2" generation. I remember this day last year....I was writing a HUGE paper and had the little Vatican webcam down on the corner of my screen, and when I saw the smoke, I was at my TV in a flash...and then I cried I was so excited. Not just by who walked on to the balcony, but by the whole thing.
JP2 was the only Papa I had ever known, and I remember being so scared and uncertain after he died, thinking "What will we do? He's gone?" I know it's silly now, but at the time, the process was so new to me. I'd never seen it. I had never waited with my Catholic brothers and sisters during a conclave; that was something of the past. Watching the papal election made me realize...we've done this for 2,000 years. And the Church goes on.
And I remember before World Youth Day, the media saying "they'll never come to see this man..." But we came, and I think that a lot of us youth realized that yes, we loved JP2 so much, but what we really loved is the POPE...the fact that there is one, that we are Catholic...that was the source of the love. So we came to World Youth Day because of that and we encountered this teacher, this holy, and humble man, and fell in love with him too. I am SO PROUD to call him my Papa.

Posted by: Anne Kadera at Apr 19, 2006 9:11:38 AM

I like Pope Benedict, but he can never outshine John Paul II in my opinion. After one year, I must say there's been a lot less 'drama' than I would have thought from the new pope. I wasn't expecting the papal jackboots so many were either fearing or hoping for, but did think there would have been be a high-profile pronouncement or two by now. I was very encouraged by Pope Benedict's statements on ecumenism and looked for a revival of talks with the Orthodox, but that doesn't seem to have gotten far. Of course it takes two to talk!
I remind myself that however good he is, Pope Bendict is after all an older pope: He just turned 79, the age of my father (a formerly vigorous man who now spends his days in naps). We will probably not have a long pontificate, so we will have to treasure him while we have him.

Posted by: WRY at Apr 19, 2006 9:15:03 AM

TCYM Lounge:

You're not alone. I miss JP II as well. (And I am very happy with Benedict!) Like you, I miss JP II's more outgoing nature.

I was just meditating this morning upon how John Paul transformed the papacy and changed the Church, enabling a gentle. quiet scholar like Benedict to have an built-in audience in the form of the "JPII" generation and a truly bully platform. Benedict wouldn't have had the same impact, I think, had he followed Paul VI at the height of the craziness.

And of course, I presume that John Paul and Benedict changed and influenced one another over their 20+ years of close collaboration and friendship. So while Benedict is very much his own man, he is also the man that was changed by knowing John Paul II and serving under him.

Gotta love that Holy Spirit!

Posted by: Sherry Weddell at Apr 19, 2006 9:20:28 AM

It is an awe inspiring process to behold. Like many others, JPII was the only Pope I had known for most of my life (vaguely recall JPI briefly when I was about 12/13, pretty much oblivious prior to that). BXVI seems the perfect successor to JPII - JP having been the one to propel the Church back into the forefront of world events, BXVI now building on it steadily and gently. The Church needed a pope like JPII to grab the world's attention again (which he accomplished fabulously), and, now that she has the world's attention....

Posted by: c matt at Apr 19, 2006 9:25:41 AM

He affects me the same way. The sweetness of his spirit....Amy, have you considered submitting your beautifully written tribute to Benedict to the NY Times? - or anywhere?

Posted by: Julie at Apr 19, 2006 9:26:31 AM

I admired Cardinal Ratzinger. I love Benedict XVI. How absolutely positively to provide some Spirit-led calm after the 27-year roller coaster ride that was the papacy of John Paul II. Much as that ride was loads of fun. And Benedict picked up without missing a beat. Perfect for a musician at heart. The Spirit's music continues to be played.

Posted by: Gerard E. at Apr 19, 2006 9:29:20 AM

When I read Julie's comment, I was impelled to re-read your initial post and must say she is onto something. It is a beautiful post and includes almost all of our reactions over the year.
Thank you.

Posted by: Dick Rood at Apr 19, 2006 9:53:04 AM

I have always enjoyed Ratzinger's writing. He is a master at relevance for our culture today.

Benedict's "Deus Caritas Est" is a masterpiece on love. It's the first encyclical I have been able to give to non-Catholics in a long time. Benedict is so aware that his writings need to speak to all, even non-Catholics.

Bring on more!

Posted by: Brigid at Apr 19, 2006 10:08:34 AM

Very nice reflection, Amy. I have come to admire Pope Benedict, too, and have been (to borrow from C.S. Lewis, "surprised by joy." I can't say that I am a devotee to the point where I wonder if I am a "papalotrist" (I'm not inclined in this way regardless); but I do have to admit that, my initial worries and concerns as a "progressive" Catholic were completely misplaced and wrong. I hope that all Catholics who embraced Benedict somewhat reluctantly one year ago, recognize the truth about Benedict and embrace him more fully, willingly, and faithfully.

Posted by: Jimmy Huck at Apr 19, 2006 10:11:44 AM

Very finely written reflection, and a perfect summary of Pope Benedict's first year. I didn't know too much about him before his election, but when I learned about his love of music (mainly Mozart) and cats, that settled it! Well, not really ... seriously, watching and listening to him in the past year has convinced me that, far from being a "Rottweiler", he is a true "German Shepherd". His gentleness, erudition and dignity are all enhanced by the occasional twinkle in his eyes, and he seems so young at heart despite his chronological age. I have grown to love and admire him. As Gerard E. puts it so well, "The Holy Spirit's music continues to be played." Viva il Papa Benedetto!

Posted by: Patricia Gonzalez at Apr 19, 2006 10:47:29 AM

As usual, for Brigid he's "Ratzinger" and "Benedict." Titles simply won't do.

Brigid, hope you never get an invite to the White House. I'll bet the words "Mr. President" would simply refuse to roll off your tongue.

Posted by: Christine at Apr 19, 2006 11:12:17 AM

Christine - Why would you go spoil Brigid's nicely-expressed sentiments about the Pope with a snide remark about her lack of the use of Titles? I imagine Benedict wouldn't mind at all if someone didn't stand on such formalities. And what does Bush have to do with anything here?

Posted by: Jimmy Huck at Apr 19, 2006 11:19:16 AM

Christine: as a 70s kinda gal, with space aliens for friends, you kinda suprise me!

Posted by: bruce cole at Apr 19, 2006 11:38:26 AM

Christine-

I'm not sure why you attack me so. Should I have used the standard in St. Blog's which is PBXVI? Others above have used the same short-hand as me. Why just me on your "proper title" lecture?

Oh, and BTW, you really don't wanna know what would roll off my tongue if I was in front of Bush right now... Lots of quotes from the second-half of "Deus Caritas Est," I suppose...

May you, Christine, have a peaceful, loving day.

Perhaps filled with meditating on "Deus Caritas Est?" Good stuff for when called upon to address the president!

Posted by: Brigid at Apr 19, 2006 11:40:09 AM

Post a comment