« Get a taste... | Main | A Belgian Puzzle »

May 07, 2006

Coronation Mass

Great attention being paid to the use of Mozart's Coronation Mass for Saturday's Mass at St. Peter's commemorating the 500th anniversary of the Swiss Guard.

Gerald of the Closed Cafeteria has photos and links here.

Fr. Z of "What Does the Prayer Really Say" also mentions it, uses it as an opportunity to comment on what "active participation" means, and has some of his own photos of Swiss Guard festivities.

It's noted at New Liturgical Movement - there's nothing in the post except the link, but there are numerous comments worth reading.

Finally, Matthew at the Shrine of the Holy Whapping has some interesting thoughts.

That sound you heard was the author of Inter Sollicitudines rolling over in his grave. Or, on the absolutely opposite end of the spectrum, Marty Haugen's head exploding.

Actually, I'm very pleased by this development, and it really shows the depth of our Pontiff's love of sacred art and also the depth of his connoisseurship. I've always loved Mozart's Coronation Mass, even if my own liturgical music tastes tend towards the Renaissance and the early Baroque (Palestrina, Victoria, Gabrieli, Biber), just before the phenomenon of the orchestral mass, Godzilla-like, really got out of control. It is good to be reminded that the stretch between Palestrina and the reforms of the 1910s was not one vast wasteland. (For the record, while well-intentioned, Inter Sollicitudines also caused a good many problems--the Cardinal of Prague, for instance, used it as an excuse to disband church orchestras and failed to foster scholas in their place). We often forget that much polyphony performed a capella today was at times accompanied by some low-level instrumentation (shawms, sackbutts, and in Spain, occasionally the double harp and, quelle scandal, the guitar*), with perhaps the notable exception of Rome, where the papal choir sung unaccompanied throughout all of the Renaissance.

Just a word here: Some of us raised on a steady diet of "new" music from the ancient days of Carey Landry, through the St. Louis Jesuits up to whatever ego-centric, tenor-driven tunes are dished up to us next by OCP tend to think of pre-1965 Catholic liturgical music as a big pot consisting mostly of chant, some classically-composed orchestral Masses and maybe some syrupy Marian hymns which were all viewed as equally appropriate at any and all times. Not so.

The history of liturgical music in the West is rather complex and has always been marked by the tension between prayer/worship and performance. There have been several times throughout history in which bishops and Popes have felt the need to step in and say "Whoa" to certain musical trends and developments. The document Andrew cites, written by Pope Pius X in 1903:

5. The Church has always recognized and favored the progress of the arts, admitting to the service of religion everything good and beautiful discovered by genius in the course of ages—always, however, with due regard to the liturgical laws. Consequently modern music is also admitted to the Church, since it, too, furnishes compositions of such excellence, sobriety and gravity, that they are in no way unworthy of the liturgical functions.

Still, since modern music has risen mainly to serve profane uses, greater care must be taken with regard to it, in order that the musical compositions of modern style which are admitted in the Church may contain nothing profane, be free from reminiscences of motifs adopted in the theaters, and be not fashioned even in their external forms after the manner of profane pieces.

6. Among the different kinds of modern music, that which appears less suitable for accompanying the functions of public worship is the theatrical style, which was in the greatest vogue, especially in Italy, during the last century. This of its very nature is diametrically opposed to Gregorian Chant and classic polyphony, and therefore to the most important law of all good sacred music. Besides the intrinsic structure, the rhythm and what is known as the conventionalism of this style adapt themselves but badly to the requirements of true liturgical music.

Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink

Comments

And all during the reign of St. Pius X, there were performances of 18th and 19th century Catholic Masses with orchestral accompaniment. Even in the Diocese of Rome.

The document can't be read as some kind of wholesale condemnation, but rather as an attempt to curb excesses and exclusive reliance on a certain popular style with many poor representative examples that tended to drive out chant.

Chant is the BEST type of liturgical music and has pride of place. But it is certainly not prescribed exclusively. And NOT at the expense of all the REST of our rich and grand tradition.

Hey, icons are far superior to Renaissance painting and statuary; does that mean we should cover over the Pieta with sheets lest anyone's spirituality be warped by it? The Liturgy of the Hours is the best communal prayer; should we ban the rosary? One can't think in these narrow, exclusivist, Philistine terms.

Posted by: Jeff at May 7, 2006 7:52:09 PM

I have fond memories of my first Solemn High Mass at the Episcopal Church of the Ascension in Chicago. The mass setting was Mozart's Coronation Mass. The clunk of dozens of kneelers as we genuflected during the appropriate part of the Credo. . .or the absolutely transcendent Sanctus as the congregation stood together with heads bowed. And people wonder why Anglo-Catholics have such a hard time converting.

Posted by: Freeman Gilbert at May 7, 2006 8:20:28 PM

I'm really glad that you gave St. Pius some extended quotatio; for anyone who has the chance, the liturgical documents concerning music in the liturgy are an absolute must read. Start with Tra le sollecitudini (don't worry, it's pretty short really), then read Sacrosanctum Concilium, Chapter 6, which starts at number 112, and finally Musicam Sacram, which is a post-Conciliar document exploring the ramifications of SC. However, be careful because it may cause you some discontentment with liturgical music as you experience it; but, the best way to change something is by learning about it first, and these documents are a great way to familiarize yourself with the teachings of the Church in regards to liturgical music.

Jake

Posted by: Jake Runyon at May 7, 2006 9:02:02 PM

amy, our parish is well known for its music ministry and have produced 2 CD's which are very professional and centered on the Lord. please check them out. http://www.songsinhispresence.com/
also, please check out my blog (above). I'm trying to help bring about a revival in the Church. anything you can do i know the Lord will be bless you. peace, gene firn

Posted by: gene firn at May 7, 2006 10:22:24 PM

amy, sorry, i thought my blog was cut/pasted here it is:http://revivein5.blogspot.com/

Posted by: gene firn at May 7, 2006 10:28:53 PM

Carey Landry. Yeesh. Brings back memories of singing "Bloom Where You're Planted" in CCD class.

I'd better go listen to Mozart's Coronation Mass to cleanse my head.

Posted by: mrsdarwin at May 8, 2006 10:13:18 AM

Very helpful post!

Also interesting is Pope Pius XI's Divini Cultus, which Adoremus reprinted here: http://www.adoremus.org/DiviniCultus.html

Excerpt: As We have learned that in some places an attempt is being made to reintroduce a type of music which is not entirely in keeping with the performance of the sacred Office, particularly owing to the excessive use made of musical instruments, We hereby declare that singing with orchestra accompaniment is not regarded by the Church as a more perfect form of music or as more suitable for sacred purposes. Voices, rather than instruments, ought to be heard in the church: the voices of the clergy, the choir and the congregation. Nor should it be deemed that the Church, in preferring the human voice to any musical instrument, is obstructing the progress of music; for no instrument, however perfect, however excellent, can surpass the human voice in expressing human thought, especially when it is used by the mind to offer up prayer and praise to Almighty God.

Posted by: Kathy at May 8, 2006 10:15:42 AM

Rembert Weakland, OSB, specifically condemned the Coronation Mass when it was sung for a Mass offered by JPII (Von Karajan & Co., back about 10 years ago...)

Heh.

Posted by: dad29 at May 8, 2006 1:19:06 PM

I appreciate all that's being said, but I don't think the world would be a perfect place if Mozart's Coronation Mass being sung at all of our parishes. I think the strength of this "Treasury of Sacred Music" stands in the inspiration to can bring in the right context. I agree that such music can actually improve our active participation, but I think the grandness (and length) of this particular piece would distract most mass attendees. However I think this piece can be very appropriate for masses sung in Latin and form major celebrations or feasts, and especially at St. Peter's in Rome! For just any (St.) Joe Schmo parish, I think something in between would be more appropriate. Something to inspire that doesn't take 30 musicians and a 40 person choir to perform.

This is why I feel there is great potential in a cappela music... no instruments. Less to distract, and more chance for the human voice to articulate the praise of the Almighty God. A wise priest Msgr. Richard Schuler once said to me that the highest form of art was the human voice in praise of God. Nothing else can communicate the human mystery quite as well.

Posted by: Ron Draganowski at Jun 12, 2006 4:45:20 PM

Post a comment