« Walking with sinners | Main | Crunching numbers »
August 17, 2006
Bishop Doran on...everything.
Many of the issues that confront us are serious, and we know by now that the political parties in our country are at loggerheads as to how to solve them. We know, for instance, that adherents of one political party would place us squarely on the road to suicide as a people.
The seven “sacraments” of their secular culture are abortion, buggery, contraception, divorce, euthanasia, feminism of the radical type, and genetic experimentation and mutilation. These things they unabashedly espouse, profess and promote. Their continuance in public office is a clear and present danger to our survival as a nation.
Since the mid-1940s we have been accustomed to look askance at Germans. They were protagonists of the Second World War and so responsible for fifty million deaths. We say, “How awful,” and yet in our country we have, for the most part, allowed the party of death and the court system it has produced to eliminate, since 1973, upwards of forty million of our fellow citizens without allowing them to see the light of day. They have done their best to make ours a true culture of death. No doubt, we shall soon outstrip the Nazis in doing human beings to death.
Let the arguments begin...
It might be noted that there is a gubernatorial race in Illinois this fall. Democratic governor Rod Blagojevich is a disaster for life (among other things, last year he issued an emergency order that all pharmacists fill all prescriptions, conscience aside) but his Republican opponent, Judy Baar Topinka is also pro-abortion rights, with the moderating hedges of being for parental and spousal consent. Jill Stanek, in the previous link, explains how meaningless that is (the quote I'm pulling is from the comments, not the original post)
In this case, Topinka's position against pba is of no consequence, since there is now a federal ban (in the courts). It's an all talk, no walk, sounds good to moderates position.
Same with parental notification. This law was passed in IL several years ago and is stuck in the IL Supreme Court. There's nothing Topinka could do about it, even if she wanted to.
On pro-life issues Topinka could impact in IL, she has indicated she supports forcing pharmacists to dispense drugs against their conscience and that she also supports embryonic stem cell experimentation.
So, there, in a nutshell, is the problem with continuing to talk about this on the level of parties - yes, the Dems should be held accountable for their platform and total intolerance of any kind of pro-life views on a national level, but to be absolutely honest, the GOP, while it certainly produces more candidates more hospitable to dealing with life issues honestly and forthrightly, and is not formally supportive of abortion rights, probably just wishes the issues - and those who clamor for them - would just go away. The issues will only be clarified, of course, as the fight for the 2008 nomination heats up.
Propping up the damn and holding back the waters - pro-lifers know that this is basically what we're doing on a political level, unfortunately. Even as public opinion shifts, slowly but steadily towards recognition of the humanity of the unborn, politicians of all stripes run ever more quickly away from the issue.
Oh, and in case you were going to say, "Well, war is a "life" issue, too..." Bishop Doran continues...
What we have to remember is that violence breeds violence. When we tolerate unjust attacks upon the tiniest innocents among us, we habituate ourselves to violence. And so we have allowed these barbaric practices to corrupt our laws, our medical practice, and even our ordinary lives. How accustomed we have become to the immense loss of life in our wars throughout the world! Those who have killed millions under their mother’s hearts cannot be expected to balk at a mere few thousand killed in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Somalia, in Darfur, in Bosnia, in Madrid, in London, in Baghdad, in Beirut, in Washington, in New York. The violence of abortion coarsens the lives of all of us.
Once it was said, “... for all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52) So we see the rise in the number of predations among youth, even among the youngest, the rise of domestic violence. We speak of road rage as a common thing. It is true what the theologians have said, that sin darkens the intellect, and weakens the will.
Having sown the wind of abortion we now reap the whirlwind. This appears in every quarter of our culture and on every day. And that just from the first of the “sacraments of death” of our secular human culture.
Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink
Comments
Abortion has not only coarsened all our lives - it has corrupted them. And it has certainly corrupted political discourse in both parties. And unfortunately, it appears to have unsettled the good bishop sufficiently that he thinks there is a political solution: vote Republican. Having seen enough Republican and Democratic politicians at work in the 50+ conscious years of my life, I have my doubts since the functional sociopaths elected to public office serve only their personal interests, and they transcend party lines.
Posted by: Dan Crawford at Aug 17, 2006 11:36:01 AM
Holy Deus Lo Volt, Batman!
Usually I need coffee reading a bishop's column. This is like eating the beans straight from the bag.
Nice ABC mnemonic on the seven sacraments of death from the Bishop, too. Haven't seen a "buggery" reference since the Pogues.
Posted by: Dale Price at Aug 17, 2006 11:37:31 AM
Godwin's law by the fourth paragraph... no need to read more it seems.
Posted by: Morning's Minion at Aug 17, 2006 11:40:36 AM
"The seven “sacraments” of their secular culture are abortion, buggery, contraception, divorce, euthanasia, feminism of the radical type, and genetic experimentation and mutilation."
This is why the pro-life case gets demonized and dismissed so easily. Where are the "sacraments" of the death penalty, torture, war, poverty, lack of health care, disdain for the environment, and racism?
All are part of the culture of life.
Posted by: Morning's Minion at Aug 17, 2006 11:47:36 AM
It's good to hear of a Catholic bishop actually taking a stand and saying something significant!
Posted by: GregK at Aug 17, 2006 11:50:21 AM
I can only say that the bishop is right about the fact that abortion, divorce and the rest have corsened us all.
I'm not really sure that all people are so corsened that the death resulting from wars, from the WWs to the current wars, don't bother them (see just war argument going on below). I think that people are at a loss in our current clash of civilizations (and I do believe that is what we are in) what should be done to try and prevent that clash from resulting in an all out jihad on Christians and all non-muslims.
On the parties, it was said above that there is no bravery in either party and I think there is, but those politicians are far and few between.
I've been in the DC metro area for 6 years and I have been witness to the constant struggle for control of the republican platform with regard to inclusion of social conservatives vs. divorce from them in favor of moderate republicans. It's disgusting. I also am not buying the democratic position of "let's work on reducing the number of abortions by eliminating the causes."
Dolan does a good job of lisitng the causes in his column and I don't see any evidence of any party addressing those in any substantive way.
Posted by: Kathleen at Aug 17, 2006 11:53:59 AM
I love this man. Perhaps he is one exception to the ban against cloning.
Posted by: Joe Strummer at Aug 17, 2006 11:54:59 AM
What the heck MM? Where are you getting all that bile from?
A bishop (finally!) takes a courageous stand and confronts the evils of society head on - and you're complaining that he's not taking on ALL the evils of society. Give the man a break! I'm sure he's also opposed to racism, war, poverty, poor health care, and strangling puppies (as are nearly ever self-described pro-life person I have ever had the privilege of getting to know) - does he need to say so at every turn?
Or perhaps you prefer the timid bishops of the 70's and 80's who generally did and said so little in opposition to abortion that a generation grew up without clear knowledge of the Church's teaching on the matter.
Posted by: Tim Ferguson at Aug 17, 2006 12:04:53 PM
Amy does an excellent job showing how a focus on "party" in moral analysis is quite unhelpful. If the bishop had read THE PARTY OF DEATH, he'd know that the author (despite the dust jacket) is not referring to the Democratic Party alone.
The view that easy access to abortion in American society is the taproot of violence will not stand historical scrutiny. Long before before Roe v. Wade, way back in the fifties, the American public supported MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) as our defense policy. It's not surprising that America would become the society with the most liberal abortion laws in the Western world after more than two and a half decades of supporting the notion that we could defend ourselves by targeting for destruction whole metropolises in a megasecond. Eight years before Roe v. Wade, the Church condemned the thinking behind this policy in GAUDIUM ET SPES, 80.
Rhetorical flourishes are appropriate in homiletic efforts, but not in sober moral analysis (more appropriate in pastoral letters). Unborn babies are not yet citizens despite their unquestioned membership in the human family.
Several of the bishop's "seven sacraments of secular culture" are right at home not only in the Republican Party, but much more importantly for any bishop, they are right at home in American Catholic culture. Catholics are more supportive of same sex marriage than evangelical Protestants, are very supportive of contraception, and are just as likely to divorce and remarry as the general population. It's much easier to score points with Republican Catholics than to challenge effectively the widespread dissent from Catholic teaching of both liberal and conservative Catholics. Once one moves out of the combox world one discovers that Republican Catholics are every bit as supportive of contraception as Democratic Catholics.
The five or six bishops who make the mistake of thinking that a Catholic MUST vote for Republicans are wrong both theologically and politically. There are many complex prudential decisions, which, according to Catholic teaching, are especially the province of the laity, in the application of Catholic teaching on peace and social justice. The Church has been down this road before with disastrous results. Pio Nono's insistence that Catholics not participate in national elections was a huge flop. Cardinal Ottaviani had the right idea when he repudiated the idea that Catholics who voted Communist in Italian elections were excommunicated. Not those who adhered to the Party sic et simpliciter, he insisted, but only those who subscribed to dialectical materialism. Of course, a dialectical materialist, by definition, is an atheist, and would be quite amused by any "excommunication". A Catholic in the United States could find reasons based on different prudential judgments for voting Republican, Democrat, or even Socialist (as Benedict XVI's comment about "democratic socialism" in his FIRST THINGS article makes clear). It is not the role of bishops to direct the voting practices of Catholics, but to clarify the moral principles involved in public policy decisions. There are scrupulously orthodox Catholics who vote Democratic (or even Socialist) and pro-life Catholics who vote Republican who dissent from recent Catholic teaching on war (for example, the astounding defense of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that surfaced in Mark Shea's comboxes recently). The current premier of Italy is a daily communicant who battles the pro-abortion elements in his Socialist party. Italian Catholics would be astounded to learn that he "sinned" by being active in the Socialist party.
To their credit, the last several popes have been very careful to stay clear of partisan battles between committed Catholics about prudential applications of Catholic social teaching. And, fortunately, this is the policy of the majority of American bishops.
Posted by: Tom Haessler at Aug 17, 2006 12:06:38 PM
None of MM's seven sacraments are platform positions of one political party in this country. Nice attempt, but way off the mark.
Posted by: ken at Aug 17, 2006 12:07:59 PM
"This is why the pro-life case gets demonized and dismissed so easily".
I don't think so.
Bp. Dolan listed seven very serious sins that we are indulging in as a society. He did us all a favor by not allowing room for his followers to claim the Church equates the evil of a lack of heating assistance with intrauterine dismemberment.
Perhaps we are demonized and dismissed so easily because so many other statements seemingly invite dismissal by throwing abortion in with lesser problems as if they were of similar gravity.
Posted by: Marc at Aug 17, 2006 12:15:19 PM
"This is why the pro-life case gets demonized and dismissed so easily".
I don't think so.
Bp. Dolan listed seven very serious sins that we are indulging in as a society. He did us all a favor by not allowing room for his followers to claim the Church equates the evil of a lack of heating assistance with intrauterine dismemberment.
Perhaps we are demonized and dismissed so easily because so many other statements seemingly invite dismissal by throwing abortion in with lesser problems as if they were of similar gravity.
Posted by: Matt at Aug 17, 2006 12:16:21 PM
"death penalty, torture, war, poverty, lack of health care, disdain for the environment, and racism?"
They say that when you throw a stone into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one you hit.
Which party endorses any of these things as so necessary to human liberty as to be beyond the right of the state to regulate or forbid?
PVO
Posted by: mulopwepaul at Aug 17, 2006 12:33:01 PM
Wonderful to hear such frank talk from one of our shepherds! No mealy-mouthed 'happy-talk' here!
Posted by: Cornelius at Aug 17, 2006 12:33:57 PM
Wonderful to hear such frank talk from one of our shepherds! No mealy-mouthed 'happy-talk' here!
Posted by: Cornelius at Aug 17, 2006 12:34:36 PM
Wonderful to hear such frank talk from one of our shepherds! No mealy-mouthed 'happy-talk' here!
Posted by: Cornelius at Aug 17, 2006 12:35:06 PM
Bp Dolan is simply repeating what Mother Teresa so fearlessly said at the Prayer Breakfast with President Bill & Hilary Clinton in 1994: UNTIL A CHILD IS SAFE IN HER MOTHER'S WOMB, NOBODY IS SAFE ANYWHERE. Period.
Until we get that foundation in place, we're trying to build a house on sand & Jesus told us a long time ago how useless that is.
Posted by: GTB at Aug 17, 2006 12:35:54 PM
Yes, to squew these complaints in the direction of one political party is Reich's Church, straight up and down. Since we're talking about buggery, one wonders why it is that the good bishop failed to include apologies - some "Catholic" - for the noxious Bush stem-cell compromise of 2001 in his list of "sacraments". I, for one, would be happier if the Dolans, Chaputs and Schmaputs would cease with their de facto attempts to muscle well meaning Catholics in the direction of the Republican party.
Posted by: cathman at Aug 17, 2006 12:38:03 PM
I have a hard time taking seriously any argument that equates abortion with poverty. As I’ve said before the first takes life and is irreversible, while the second is neither. It often seems to me that the progressive final solution (is that obliquely Godwinian?) to poverty is to nip it in the bud…or that is in the uterus…or at least to be complicit in equivocation.
But as to the bishop’s column…I honestly think that both parties should be pitched overboard.
Posted by: mcmlxix at Aug 17, 2006 12:43:07 PM
It's Bishop Doran not Bishop Dolan if anyone thought this was the Bishop of Milwaukee.
Posted by: Tim F. at Aug 17, 2006 12:56:26 PM
"But as to the bishop’s column…I honestly think that both parties should be pitched overboard."
I hear you! And I'm registered to vote in IL, more's the pity. I still have not worked out if it is better to abstain or to vote for the lesser of two evils - but as they are both pro-abortion in IL, what to do? I'm also considering renouncing my state of legal residence and perhaps voting where I live. The final option would be to request the ballot, chop it into bits and mail it to the Republicans for allowing Topinka to happen!
Thank you, Bishop Dolan! I hope this column goes international!
Posted by: Catholic Wife and Mother at Aug 17, 2006 1:02:00 PM
Hard to see why a serious argument would use an old gents expression like buggery. The OED gives the following derivation:
"Middle English [Middle Dutch from Old French bougre heretic, sodomite (archaic), person (colloq.), from medieval Latin Bulgarus, Bulgarian, (especially as adhering to the Orthodox Church), heretic, Albigensian]."
The definition of the oldest historical usage for bugger is "A heretic, specifically an Albigensian."
Sodomy ("Any form of sexual intercourse with a person of the same or opposite sex, except copulation; spec. anal intercourse. Also bestiality") might have been a better word choice.
Posted by: James Englert at Aug 17, 2006 1:06:59 PM
Matt,
The "seven sacraments of THEIR secular culture". The antecedent of "their" is "the Democratic party", not society in general. As I pointed out in my post, dissent from Catholic teaching on some of these is widespread among Catholics, whether Republican or Democrat. IMHO, it's not particularly prophetic to point out the deficiencies of the Democratic platform; it would be enormously prophetic for the bishop to discuss forthrightly the widespread dissent among Catholcs (including priests) from Catholic teaching on contraception. Support for abortion among high profile Catholics of BOTH parties (Kennedy, Schwarzenegger) is a more important issue than the party platform.
Proponents of a consistent ethic of life (the position of John Paul the Great and Benedict XVI) do NOT, and never have, equated lack of heating assistance to abortion. This facile dismissal of the seamless garment argument has been responded to, not only by Cardinal Bernardine himself, but by high profile Catholics in the pro-life movement (like Joan Andrews for starters) many times. Killing in an unjust war, or targeting non-combatants in a just war is wrong for exactly the same reason that abortion is wrong - direct attack on the life of the innocent. John Paul the Great discussed both capital punishment AND war in his encyclical on life, EVANGELIUM VITAE. Catholic teaching on capital punishment is not a prudential judgment, but a development of previous teaching. The application of the teaching DOES involve prudential judgments, but the teaching itself does not. The teaching (executions for murder which are unnecessary are immoral) is to be distinguished from prudential judgments (here and now in this place the innocent cannot be defended without this execution).
At the pro-life demo in Washington, there were many signs which linked the abortion issue with war and capital punishment. I have no problem whatsoever with Catholics who make the prudential judgment that today we should vote Republican. [I voted for Bush, reluctantly, twice; I'm still quite undecided on what Party to support in the coming elections]. But I have a huge problem with Catholics (whether bishops or laity) who suggest that adherence to Catholic doctrine necessitates voting Republican. This is bad theology.
Posted by: Tom Haessler at Aug 17, 2006 1:10:40 PM
James,
B is for buggery. The bishop's list only got up to G is for genetic experimentation and mutilation. It might have been unwieldy had it gone up to S is for sodomy.
Yes, I am generation Seseme Street.
Posted by: mcmlxix at Aug 17, 2006 1:12:30 PM
I concur with the Morning Star's Minion's criticisms. And I would add the "sacraments" of baby seal clubbing, over fishing, alien abduction, cattle mutilation, cannibalism, and the kidnapping of young children to sell them into slavery to high lord Bokthu of the planet Xexu. And will those dastardly conservative types ever open their hearts to the victims of the Chupacabra? I doubt it.
Posted by: Loudon is a Fool at Aug 17, 2006 1:14:22 PM



















