« Amazing | Main | Witch-hunt »
August 04, 2006
Middle East post of the night
Comments won't be opened until morning, when I'm sure more stories will appear:
Hezbollah using Christian villages as shields:
A Christian from the village of Ain Ebel, who requested to remain nameless for fear of a reprisal from Hezbollah, reported that he found Hezbollah fighters setting up a launcher on his rooftop. Hezbollah fighters ignored his pleas to stop and fired the missiles. He immediately gathered his family and fled his home, which was bombed 15 minutes later by an Israeli air strike.
Hezbollah has also attempted to stop Christians from fleeing their villages. According to Christian Solidarity International, on July 28, Hezbollah fighters fired upon several Christians fleeing Rmeish with their families, wounding two.
Sami El-Khoury, president of the World Maronite Union, adds that media reports about Christian support for Hezbollah are inaccurate.
"Contrary to Western press reports, indicating high percentages of Christian support for Hezbollah, 90 percent of Christians, 80 percent of Sunni and 40 percent of Shiites in Lebanon oppose Hezbollah," El-Khoury told Christian Solidarity International.
Christian Solidarity International has called for the United Nations to establish a politically independent commission to investigate Hezbollah's contravention of international law. The group has also urged the UN Security Council to deploy immediately an international force in Lebanon to facilitate a ceasefire, to stop the flow of arms from Syria to Hezbollah, and to assist the Lebanese government in fulfilling its obligation to disarm Hezbollah.
The Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem speaks:
After describing what is going on in Gaza and southern Lebanon as “simply inhuman”, Mgr Sabbah criticized the tardiness of the international community which instead “should interfere with greater efficiency in order to put an end” to the violence, a real “vicious cycle of death” that must be broken by the strongest. The patriarch seemingly condemns the violence of the Palestinian and Lebanese militia (and suicide bombers) as well as that perpetrated by the Israeli army: “Experience in this conflict has proved that violence has only generated and even increased violence, did not give the required security and it is useless to found a new order.”
Part of his appeal is addressed more directly to the Israelis: “Military power alone cannot protect. Military reprisals only increase the refusal that encircles Israel in the region. Indeed the result is the deepening of hatred and refusal.”
The patriarch continued: “The only action to use for legitimate defense, that can really protect and will have as result the required security, consists simply in putting an end to the initial injustice which is the heart of this long conflict, that is, the Palestinian question. It consists in putting an end to the Israeli military occupation imposed for years upon the Palestinians, and giving them back their freedom and their independence.”
Mgr Sabbah said: “As long as the oppression lasts, the oppression will give birth to violence.”
An op-ed in the Jerusalem Post looks at the media:
CNN "senior international correspondent" Nic Robertson admitted that his anti-Israel report from Beirut on July 18 about civilian casualties in Lebanon, was stage-managed from start to finish by Hizbullah. He revealed that his story was heavily influenced by Hizbullah's "press officer" and that Hizbullah has "very, very sophisticated and slick media operations."
When pressed a few days later about his reporting on the CNN program "Reliable Sources," Robertson acknowledged that Hizbullah militants had instructed the CNN camera team where and what to film. Hizbullah "had control of the situation," Robertson said. "They designated the places that we went to, and we certainly didn't have time to go into the houses or lift up the rubble to see what was underneath."
Robertson added that Hizbullah has "very, very good control over its areas in the south of Beirut. They deny journalists access into those areas. You don't get in there without their permission. We didn't have enough time to see if perhaps there was somebody there who was, you know, a taxi driver by day, and a Hizbullah fighter by night."
Yet "Reliable Sources," presented by Washington Post writer Howard Kurtz, is broadcast only on the American version of CNN. So CNN International viewers around the world will not have had the opportunity to learn from CNN's correspondent that the pictures they saw from Beirut were carefully selected for them by Hizbullah.
Another journalist let the cat out of the bag last week. Writing on his blog while reporting from southern Lebanon, Time magazine contributor Christopher Allbritton, casually mentioned in the middle of a posting: "To the south, along the curve of the coast, Hizbullah is launching Katyushas, but I'm loathe to say too much about them. The Party of God has a copy of every journalist's passport, and they've already hassled a number of us and threatened one."
snip
But meanwhile anti-Semitic coverage and cartoons are spreading across the globe. Norway's third largest paper, the Oslo daily Dagbladet, ran a cartoon comparing Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to the infamous Nazi commander SS Major Amon Goeth who indiscriminately murdered Jews by firing at them from his balcony and was depicted by Ralph Fiennes in Steven Spielberg's film Schindler's List. (A month earlier Dagbladet published an article, "The Third Tower," which questioned whether Muslims were really responsible for the September 11 attacks.)
Antonio Neri Licon of Mexico's El Economista drew what appeared to be a Nazi soldier with stars of David on his uniform. The "soldier" was surrounded by eyes that he had apparently gouged out.
A cartoon in the South African Sunday Times depicted Ehud Olmert with a butchers knife covered in blood. In the leading Australian daily The Age, a cartoon showed a wine glass full of blood being drunk in a scene reminiscent of a medieval blood libel. In New Zealand, veteran cartoonist Tom Stott came up with a drawing which equated Israel with al-Qaida.
At least one leading European politician has also vented his prejudice through visual symbolism. Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero wore an Arab scarf during an event at which he condemned Israel, but not Hizbullah, who he presumably thinks should not be stopped from killing Israelis.
It's entirely predictable that all this violent media distortion should lead to Jews being attacked and even murdered, as happened at a Seattle Jewish center last week.
When live Jews can't be found, dead ones are targeted. In Belgium last week, the urn that contained ashes from Auschwitz was desecrated at the Brussels memorial to the 25,411 Belgian Jews deported to Nazi death camps. It was smashed and excrement smeared over it. The silence from Belgian leaders following this desecration was deafening.
Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink
Comments
I would like to recommend everyone watch "The World Over Live" on EWTN via the Internet or television tonight (Friday). EWTN is the truly "fair and balanced" network. While it's not their main story tomorrow night, they will no doubt continue to present a very fair appraisal of what is going on in the Middle East. For those Catholics who only get their news on the Middle East situation from ABC, NBC, CNN, or FOX, you owe it to yourself to broaden your knowledge and perspective.
Posted by: William at Aug 4, 2006 8:56:06 AM
Big whoop. Christian Solidarity International is an insignifant group founded by Rev. Hans Stückelberger. He's on the speaking tour with Bat Ye'or. Like he doesn't have an axe to grind.
I'm sure there are incidents here and there, as we've learned sadly happen with our own troops, but what he says is a general practice flies in the face of observations by the Vatican, the UN, aid workers, the few reporters to interview villagers and most Christian Lebanese.
As we draw closer to a ceasefire and the ability of photographers to record the devastation, it becomes important pr for defenders of the overkill to pound away at the canard that the victims weren't allowed to escape. Christopher Hitchens wrote a book about this tactic called "Blaming The Victims".
Posted by: Gary at Aug 4, 2006 9:06:07 AM
Hello Gaey,
Fortunately, the UN and the media have no axes to grind.
Posted by: Richard at Aug 4, 2006 9:23:57 AM
"Incidents here and there." Uh huh. Hezbollah's standard operating procedure is to embed itself with civilians, when they aren't pretending to be civilians themselves. Meanwhile there are plenty of credible reports of their refusing to allow civilians to flee certain areas as they fire rockets into residential areas in Israel. This is what they do, this is who they are.
Posted by: Christopher Fotos at Aug 4, 2006 9:36:18 AM
For a different Christian take on the crisis, consult the Holy Land Christian Ecumenical Foundation, which, unlike the evangelical/fundamentalist Christian Zionist groups, has the support of the Churches on the ground.
http://www.hcef.org/hcef/index.cfm/ID/2.cfm
Posted by: Patrick Rothwell at Aug 4, 2006 9:38:25 AM
Bat Ye'or is a courageous Jewish woman who was deprived of her Egyptian citizenship (despite belonging to an Egyptian Jewish community that had lived freely in Egypt for a thousand years before the "prophet" Muhammad was born). Her family moved to London as stateless persons after the unjust revocation of citizenship, and she became a very important voice countering the academic distortions of the Muslim record of persecution and humiliation of Christians and Jews living in Arab and Muslim lands. She correctly links dhimmitude (second class citizenship mandated by Sharia) and jihad, shows how, contrary to recent Muslim apologetics, jihad's primary meaning in the Quran and the Hadith is war to spread Muslim rule, not ascetic effort against one's sinful tendencies. Her high profile academic critics (like John Esposito at Georgetown) are often paid by Saudi and/or Wahhabti oil money. Her message is clear - Islam is not just a great (numbers wise) world religion. It represents a major military threat to the West and to Western ideas of human rights and pluralism. Thanks to her, many in the West now know about the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights (signed by all Muslim countries) which proves the incompatibility between the notion of human rights and Islam.
Georgetown University's approach to Muslim-Christian dialogue cannot be the model. It's a paradigmatic example of false eirenicism and religious indifferentism. One would expect this from a "Catholic" University that removed crucifixes from the classroom so as not to offend!
And, Gary, no group that brings to the attention of the world the existence of slave markets in Khartoum is "insignificant." Catholics would do well to imitate the zeal of evangelicals on this issue. It's called solidarity with victims. One can support the resolution of legitimate Palestinian demands for justice without bashing those who rightly point out the egregious violations of human rights that exist in virtually every Muslim country in the world.
Posted by: Tom Haessler at Aug 4, 2006 10:04:15 AM
Just in the case there is any doubt that Israel is operating by the lex talionis (the law of retribution, abrogated by Christ, and totally at odds with just war principles):
From Reuters:
"JERUSALEM, Aug 3 (Reuters) - Israel will destroy Lebanon's infrastructure if Hizbollah fires rockets at Tel Aviv as Hizbollah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah threatened on Thursday, a senior Israeli defence source told Channel One television. "If Tel Aviv is attacked, Lebanese national infrastructure will be destroyed," the state-owned television station said, quoting a senior military source."
Posted by: Morning's Minion at Aug 4, 2006 10:25:09 AM
Speaking of Dhimmitude, consider the Israeli variation on this. I wish I could locate the this article... in which either the Greek of Maronite archimandrite(?) of northern Israel was asked by a member of the western press why Christians hadn't taken refuge to the bomb shelters to avoid being killed by incoming Hezbollah rockets.
His response, was essentially "We're not allowed. We're citizens of Israel, but those are only for Jewish citizens."
Amazingly, this story appeared in either Ha'aretz or one of the other Israeli papers. I find it fascinating that some organs of the Israeli press have more journalistic integrity than ridiculous American propaganda/psyops shops like Fox News.
Posted by: Regretful Republican at Aug 4, 2006 10:34:13 AM
Morning's Minion's post is but one reason I have become increasingly anti-Israel in this particular war, which is saying something insofar as, if it were not for Israel's ongoing disproportionate response, I would normally be in favor of taking no quarter with Hezbollah. It is neither moral nor in our national interest to go after Hezbollah in such a way as to (deliberately, I might add) destroy Lebanon in the process. Unfortunately, neither the Bush Administration nor the Congress - both Democratic and Republican - seem to recognize this fact.
Posted by: Patrick Rothwell at Aug 4, 2006 10:39:37 AM
Hizbullah. Hezbollah. Hasbullah and many variations. Is there any one correct way of spelling this or is it ancient Egyptian you supply the vowels?
Posted by: Caroline at Aug 4, 2006 10:47:46 AM
The Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem? He is an evil old man who betrayed his priesthood ages ago to be a shill for Arafat (and now, for his successors). He will end up in the same place as collaborationist priests and prelates always do - a fit subject for Dante in our time. Sandro Magister has some excellent articles on this creature archived on his site.
Posted by: bruce cole at Aug 4, 2006 10:54:07 AM
MM,
You continue to promote an understanding of the "lex talionis" that contradicts sound exegesis. You seem to think that it was an Old Testament justification for revenge, rather than the limit setting that is the pre-history of just war theory. You also misunderstand Jesus' use of rabbinic logic. His hearers did not imagine that He was abrogating the Mosaic Law, but interpreting it with authority. This more nuanced understanding of the relationship of Jesus in His public ministry to the Law is treated in the Catechism in 577-582. The Catechism teaches that Jesus observed the entire Mosaic Law perfectly in His earthly ministry. The alleged "abrogation" of the Law occurs not because of Jesus' teaching, but because of His death (according to Saint Paul). And the Church has always condemned antinomian misunderstandings of this abrogation (the view that the Old Law was about justice and the New Law is about mercy). Both are about both.
A major theme of old-fashioned Christian anti-Semitism was the view that Judaism stood for revenge and Christians stood for mercy. Coupled with this was the view that love of neighbor was a New Testament idea foreign to the "legalism" of the Old Testament.
Are there defects in the moral analysis of some Israelis in the military? Of course. But why link this with Judaism rather than secularism (also a major influence on Israeli policies)? The same thing can be said of American military policy. Nuclear deterance without resolute efforts at multi-lateral disarmament is ethically wrong. Ahmandinajad said at the meeting of Islamic nations a couple of days ago that he supported Hezbollah's efforts to "destroy Israel".
The right path is to support the Holy Father's call for an immediate cease fire so that the international community can intervene to implement 1559 and eliminate Hezbollah as a military threat in the region. Apart from the resolute intention to support the international community in efforts to (1) disarm Hezbollah and destroy its military assets; and (2) address Palestinian demands for an end to the occupation which takes the form of guarantees for Israeli security; and (3) address the problem of Palestinian continued attacks on Israel AFTER withdrawal from Gaza - the demand for an immediate cease fire cannot be reconciled with the right of Israel to an effective defense within the framework of jus in bello considerations.
Posted by: Tom Haessler at Aug 4, 2006 10:58:42 AM
I tend to fall into Patrick's camp. Difficult to say how this situation can be resolved. It sounds very much like a hostage analogy I have read others make - that is, Israel's response at times appears similar to shooting the hostages in order to take out the hostage holders. There is no doubt that innocent civilians are being used as human shields - the question is whether you can take out those shields.
By the way, are these Katyusha thingmebobs more sophisticated than the Scuds? I thought the Patriot AM systems worked well against the Scuds - could they be used here (reducing the need for aerial bombing) or is that not technically feasible?
Posted by: c matt at Aug 4, 2006 11:04:25 AM
Here's a question that has been on my mind for some time, now, in response to those of you who think Hezbollah should be "destroyed" (which seems to include Bush).
The political landscape of Lebanon is dotted with unsavoury characters, people who did terrible things during the civil war. Take Walid Jumblatt. He is now considered a heroic stateman for facing down Syrian death threats. But in the 1980s, he was trying to ethnicaly cleanse the Chouf of Christians. Or take Shia Nabih Berri, the speaker of the Lebanese parliament. he was the leader of the notorious Amal militia during the civil war.
And the Christians weren't much better, I'm afraid. Michel Aoun, who has his eyes on the presidency when Lahoud (finally!) steps down, was reponsible for one of the worst phases of the civil war in Beirut, the late-1980s "war of liberation". And let's not even talk about notorious Labanese Forces leader Samir Geagea, recently released from jail. He was considered one of the more brutal leaders, and received support from Saddam Hussein. He was throught to have been involved in the murders of Tony Franjieh, his wife, and baby in 1978; ex-prime ministers Rahis Karameh in 1987; and Dany Chamoun (along with his wife and children), another Maronite leader. In fact, he was the only major figure from that era to spend time in jail, and he was widely popular upon his release.
My point is simple: Nasrallah is no worse than many of these characters. Hizbollah, with the support of the Shia, is a part of Lebanese civil life (a fully democracy, I must add). While it is imperative to disarm them, both to level the playing field in Lebanon, and to protect civilians in Isael from attack-- destoying them is a non-starter and will only backfire, possibly by re-igniting the civil war.
Posted by: Morning's Minion at Aug 4, 2006 11:14:37 AM
Patrick Rothwell wrote "It is neither moral nor in our national interest to go after Hezbollah in such a way as to (deliberately, I might add) destroy Lebanon in the process."
As to our national interest, we do have 130,000 soldiers just about 500 miles away and we already have our hands full with a restive population. Today, there was a huge demonstration (hundreds of thousands according to one report) in the Iraq we're trying to calm. They were demonstrating against what is going on in Lebanon and in support of what they see as Hezbollah's "resistance". Destroying Lebanon is not helpful to our mission and further endangers our soldiers, aid workers, press and local allies.
Posted by: Ron Williams at Aug 4, 2006 11:15:55 AM
regretful republican
This was in the Washington Post, July 20
"Hezbollah missiles, which have been fired regularly into northern Israel since hostilities erupted, on Wednesday landed in the Israeli Arab town of Nazareth. Two brothers -- Rabia Taluzeh, 3, and Mahmoud, 8 -- were killed around 5 p.m. as they were walking to their uncle's house when two rockets landed in the center of a main street running through the Safrefeh neighborhood in Israel's largest Arab city.
Police officials said as many as eight others were wounded in the rocket strike, while scores more were treated in local hospitals for shock. A third rocket crashed into a nearby garage, police said, but no one was injured.
'When I came out, I started taking wounded into my apartment,' said Hussam Saleh, 28, who owns a residential building along the street. 'I saw the two kids lying in the street, dead on the spot. One had been hit in the head, the other in the body.'
Nazareth, a city of 75,000 people, has no public bomb shelters or early-warning sirens commonplace in other Israeli cities across the north."
Posted by: regretful democrat at Aug 4, 2006 11:28:06 AM
MM,
Some really good points. There seems to be a problem with some of the "Christian" leaders throughout the Middle East. The effort to completely suppress Hezbollah (as opposed to destroying military assets and disarming Hezbollah militias) is unrealistic. I believe that many Middle Easterners share (regardless of religion) a fascination with guns and military hardware. I find the celebratory firing of weapons at times of rejoicing (like "martyr" funderals, etc.) quite disgusting. Those bullets have got to land somewhere! And if some of this male symbolic confusion between membrum virile and "arms" were not deeply embedded in American culture, we'd have prioritized disarming Iraqi militias from the beginning.
Posted by: Tom Haessler at Aug 4, 2006 11:40:29 AM
Caroline: As one who could once get along fairly well with Arabic, I can tell you that the spelling of Hezbollah can vary because it is a tranliteration from Arabic and some of the sounds just don't match sounds we have in English. Therefore one has a lot of latitude in attempting to phonetically replicate the sounds. You see this sometimes in Scripture where we usually spell "Noah" like that but will run across it spelled like, "Noa".
Posted by: William at Aug 4, 2006 11:42:01 AM
Tom,
Sorry, in no way did I mean to imply that the Jewish religion ifs deficient when it comes to tempering justice with mercy. I merely wanted to point out that a military response based on such a notion of revenge or retaliation is wrong. I seemed too self-evident to point out, but Shelkh Nasrallah suffers from similar moral failings when he theatens to bomb Tel Aviv.
Posted by: Morning's Minion at Aug 4, 2006 11:42:12 AM
"The Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem? He is an evil old man who betrayed his priesthood ages ago to be a shill for Arafat (and now, for his successors)." Here we go again, defaming the character of a good man without any evidence. And that John Paul II! Met with Arafat several times! How dare he!!
Posted by: William at Aug 4, 2006 11:45:36 AM
"Nabila Espanioly, the director of a charitable organisation in Nazareth promoting women and children's interests, makes a point worth remembering as the foreign and Israeli media huddle in the shelters of Haifa and Nahariya interviewing terrified "Israelis".
In fact, they are talking not to Israelis but to Israeli Jews. The fifth of the Israeli population who are not Jewish but Arab are rarely to be found hiding in public shelters because the authorities neglected to build any in their towns and villages.
In other words, although the Israeli army has sited several important weapons factories and military intelligence posts close to Arab communities in the north, the Israeli government has not offered the Arab residents any protection should there be fall-out -- quite literally in the case of the Katyusha rockets -- as a result.
This is another tiny facet of the discrimination endured for decades by the country's Arab population that so rarely surfaces in media coverage of Israel.
Similarly oblivious to the ironies, the Israeli and foreign media have been running heart-warming stories about how "Israelis" are opening their homes and hearths to their compatriots fleeing the north. Again for "Israelis" substitute "Israeli Jews".
No one I know here in Nazareth believes they would find much of a welcome in Tel Aviv or Beersheva should they go looking for one. Which leaves them with nowhere to run should they need to.
The only Arab communities out of the line of Hizbullah fire are those in the southern Negev belonging to the Bedouin. But that is not much comfort. Most of the Negev's 150,000 Bedouin have been forced to live in squalid tents and metal shacks by an Israeli government that bulldozes anything more permanent. The authorities also deprive many of the Bedouin communities of water and all public services. So sweating it out with the Katyushas may be the better option."
Jonathan Cook, Electronic Lebanon, 7/18
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article5079.shtml
Posted by: Marty at Aug 4, 2006 11:45:57 AM
William,
John Paul the Great meeting with Arafat was no more an endorsement of Arafat's politics or terrorism than his meeting with Fidel Castro was an endorsement of Communism. The pope should meet with anyone and everyone if it can be a contribution to peace.
Posted by: Tom Haessler at Aug 4, 2006 11:58:42 AM
regretful republican
I think I found it. Was in John Allen's July 28th column, "All Things Catholic":
Melkite Catholic Archbishop Elias Chacour of Akka, Haifa, Nazareth and all of Galilee issued a separate statement saying that Arab Christians in northern Israel have been especially hard-hit by the current round of violence. Many do not have bomb shelters, he said, cannot take refuge in Haifa or other large Israeli cities as easily as Jews, and are denied certain kinds of compensation by the Israeli government.
"I never imagined that a day will come that I have to make an appeal, a kind of SOS for us Christians in Galilee. We wish to wipe away the tears of the children and parents in these difficult times," Chacour said.
Posted by: regretful democrat at Aug 4, 2006 12:04:02 PM
Tom: "John Paul the Great meeting with Arafat was no more an endorsement of Arafat's politics or terrorism than his meeting with Fidel Castro was an endorsement of Communism. The pope should meet with anyone and everyone if it can be a contribution to peace."
And pretty much the same should be said of the Patriarch of Jerusalem when he met with any political leaders, whether or not it was the King of Jordan, Israeli leaders or Arafat. Certainly with Arafat, it provided the Patriarch not only the opportunity to encourage Arafat to truly act on behalf of their fellow Palestinians, but to exhort him in areas that he needed exhorting. BTW, no hard feelings, but your earlier unfounded and undocumented accusations, (based on hearsay) against this good man means that you have no credibility on this issue.
Posted by: William at Aug 4, 2006 12:41:05 PM
My son says that the whole Middle East should be paved over and used as a parking lot. After reading all the above posts, I'm beginning to wonder if that shouldn't actually happen. Nevertheless, IMO Hizbollah are barbarians -- foaming Bronze Age Fanatics, as Mark Shea calls them -- and I hope the Israelis kick their collective a**
Posted by: Patricia Gonzalez at Aug 4, 2006 12:50:35 PM



















