« Well, that's done | Main | All I want... »

November 22, 2006

Boo

One of the constant temptations of this blog is to slide into "pick on the parish" mode. It's so easy. Like fish in a barrel, she said imaginatively, even though National Cliche Day was long past.

There is such a plethora of Catholic nuttiness out there, and one could literally fill a blog with it, every day. And not just from the "left" or the "mediocre middle," either.

(In his travels, my husband has attended one particular church in a particular city in the South, three times now. The first time he went there just because of convenience, but has returned out of morbid curiosity. The Mass is mostly in Latin - Novus Ordo - prayed at breakneck speed in a deep southern accent by an elderly priest who has apparently been there for years. Decades. The second time Michael went there, for a daily Mass, the priest showed up about 15 minutes before Mass began, plopped himself in the Presider's chair,and read the newspaper for a while before he returned to the sacristy to vest. He tells very strange stories. And at the end of Sunday Mass, the Star-Spangled Banner is sung. Michael feels that Walker Percy must have attended this Church before he wrote Love in the Ruins. )

But we try not to do this, just because. Although a National Mystery Church Goer Blog would certainly be a worthwhile project. A Ship of Fools kind of thing, but focused on the U.S. Catholic Church.

So, all that is by way of introducing another lovely liturgy. Another HALLOWEEN MASS as it happens. Yay!

Gerald at Closed Cafeteria must be given credit for this one. No, not that he did it, but that he brought it to our attention.

No shaky phone camera YouTube this time, though - it's a lovely slide show on the parish website. A parish in MIchigan.

Same idea, it seems - sanctuary decorated with jack-o-laterns, black cats and spiders. Children and a few adults coming in costume. (Note that the church is about half-full, I'd say). Priest in costume.

At first I thought the priest's costume was some sort of medieval clerical robe tossed over his vestments. The musicians seemed to be doing a Renaissance thing, so it seemed logical. But in reading the comments at Gerald's and studying the photos, I saw...no. The red cape and hood are a devil costume! Which, apparently, during the homily, the priest turns inside out to reveal a white cape - an angel. It appears from the one slide of the rest of Mass, he ditches the costume for the Liturgy of the Eucharist. Well.

It is such a hard, hard thing to be in ministry - any kind of ministry. Our culture is loud and raucous and seductive and promises all kinds of things and seems to deliver on a lot of them - for now. Religion seems to be the last thing on anyone's mind, except as the fulfilment of some sort of vague social identity that Good Citizens must have.

And so we struggle to figure out how to make our way in this, how to just get people in the door so they can just hear a bit - even a little bit - of what we have to say, and we pray we say it in a way that means something, that rises above the rest of the cacophany and might, just might next week bring them back for more - a little more, a little deeper.

But this is not it. Not this in particular or the general idea it represents.

You see, we seem to think that this seductive, attractive culture we live in, in which we struggle to hear Christ in, is the first and the worst. No one has ever had to live in times like these, we think. Christianity has never had to compete with anything like this. So we have to constantly come up with completely new stuff, and the past has no value at all. Because no one ever had to deal with this before. It was never like this.

Oh, yes it has - and worse. The seven deadly sins were not invented yesterday. They idea of "temptation" is not a new one. The Gospel has always been lived and preached in a world of selfishness and despair, of cruelty and pleasure-seeking. It's called the world.

What is more challenging - to preach the Gospel in a country in which everything material is attainable and decent health is the norm or a society in which despair threatens in the guise of Plague or War or Martyrdom?

My point is that this frantic insistence, with us for too many years now, that Catholics have to constantly Make Stuff Up and Be Like the MegaChurches and Relate and Make it Real just doesn't work. It doesn't lead us anywhere. It takes what should be - what is a feast, and serves a little bowl of carrots instead.

Jesting, feasting, frolicing, festivals, masque, joyous, earthy music and raucousness are all very Catholic. Jansenists and a few others excepted.

But not during Mass.

Someone - perhaps in our previous discussion of Halloween Mass 1.0 - wondered if some of this insistence on playing with Mass and incorporating really inapporpriate music into Mass could be blamed, in part on the fact that in much of the Catholic world, everything but Mass was wiped out. Can't blame it all on V2,  now. There are the sociological reasons, the development of suburbia, the collapse of close-knit ethnic communities, the mobility.

But still. If you know your History of Pastoral Practices, you know that all of that other stuff became distinctly déclassé in the Bright New Church. So everything got dumped on Sunday Mass.

Even Halloween costumes, apparently.

I have more, but I said it before.

The unintentional poignancy of this slide show is the music. Bach accompanies the first part, and then it switches into something different and even more resonant - Blessed is the Man, sung by the St. Eliyah's Children Choir. The dissonance between sound and image is pretty breathtaking.

The Saint Elijah Church, situated in Podol district of Kyiv, is the first Russian Orthodox church ever built. According to legend, it was built by the Prince Askold and Dir long before the baptizing of Kyiv Rus. The Saint chronicler Nestor writes about this event in his Fable of Ancient Times.

In 988 The Great equel to Apostle Prince Vladimir began baptizing the people of Kyiv Rus near this church on the banks of the Dnieper River.

And now this church, though small in size is under jurisdiction of the Metropolitan of Kyiv and the whole Ukraine Vladimir is a favourite place for praying for the Kyivites. Archiepriest Vitaly Kosovskiy is the dean of the church since 1991.

On the 19th of December 1996 the childrens choir began to sing for the glory of God.

The children regularly take part in Sunday and festive liturgies and has become an integral part of ther life. The choir also has consert activities. During a short time of its existence it won the All-Ukranian (1997, the town of Rivne) and International (1998, the town of Eupatoria) festivals.

In this album you can hear both little-known old spiritual songs of the 16-17th centuries and traditional and authors spirituel hymns of liturgies of the 18th beginning of the 20th centuries.

Special attention should be paid to old Ukranian cantical part of the album where warm feelings of Ukranian people to God are particularly expressed. The choir has become the first Orthodox childrens choir of Kyiv after almost a one hundred years interval. 

If only they could come to liturgy dressed as a robot and giggle at Father in his devil/angel cape. Then we'd really be teaching them that Christian thing.

Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink

Comments

The trouble is it DOES work. The contemporary culture sensitive ministry does touch people. Having it at the mass might be the wrong place. Still, as you point out, spending a lot of effort doing something beyond Sunday mass is hard to sell to you average parish.

I see protestant services that are very well done. I have a brother and a sister who are protestant pastors and their services are awesome. What is more people come in and exerience God on some level. The trouble is when they want more depth it isn't there.

Why do we have to choose between a reverend Eucharist and relelvant minstry outside the church? Why can't we have both. I know both take a lot of effort. So what? The early church excluded all the seekers from their mass. That part was just for the baptized.

Posted by: Randy at Nov 22, 2006 3:28:23 PM

Pizza is NOT valid matter for consecration!

Posted by: Brian at Nov 22, 2006 3:28:23 PM

Randy:

There are serious questions being raised right now within evangelicalism about the long-term effectiveness of the seeker-sensivite/culturally with-it model. Serious questions.

There are doubts brewing there, for real. People are worried.

Posted by: Maddie at Nov 22, 2006 3:31:40 PM

It DOES NOT work.The people who are turned on by these shows are the avantguarde and the superficial.Anyone with a deep prayer life would be nauseated by such idiocy.What diocese is it in? I bet they ban ar strictly limit the Traditional Latin Mass. So the priest's costume id
s a devil? I doubt it.It looks more like Little Miss Riding Hood.The wolf!

Posted by: franklyn at Nov 22, 2006 3:36:54 PM

"And not just from the 'left' or the 'mediocre middle,' either."

The worst ideas in my view still come from, heaven love them, catechetical types, right, left, and all over.

I suppose with the advent of conservatives you-tubing, we'll have lots of stuff to pick over in the blogosphere. I can't say I look forward to it.

Not only is ministry hard, but it requires the long view, especially when we come face to face with reform--things like liturgy and music, for instance. It is very hard for both reformers, reform2-ers, and others to accept that the seeds planted may take years to sprout, and it may well be after we're all dead. For people harnessing their energies for the long haul, it's a realization we all need to make. And then live by.

My sense is to keep going with the notions of beauty and quality and wait for them to run out of gas in the real world. When they do, my parish is ready for them.

Posted by: Todd at Nov 22, 2006 3:37:51 PM

We also experienced the "costume mass" at a parish in the area (not our own) this past Halloween. Costumed children were processed in as the congregation sang "O When the Saints Go Marching In." The words were projected onto the walls to the left and the right of the altar, although the choir apparently had different verses in their hymnals. Our kids seemed to enjoy the spectacle, but my wife and I just shook our heads.

The other day Amy talked about people who say things like “I’m not a liturgical hardliner, but…” I certainly would put myself in this category. I’m not pining for a return to the Latin or worship ad orientem. I don’t think liturgical music has all been going to hell since Palestrina. I don’t write long, single-spaced letters to my bishop citing violation after violation of the GIRM.

All I want is for the Eucharist to be celebrated with words, music and gesture that reflects the fact that we are engaged in the worship of God. Why is that so very difficult?

Posted by: Peter Nixon at Nov 22, 2006 3:49:24 PM

You just know people were saying "Trick or Treat" when they went up for communion.

This stuff is like a twilight zone episode. But it does go to show that when we removed the religious images from our churches it became easier for people to forget something eternal and holy was present in the tabernacle and made present on the altar.

When I was in 7th grade, there was a homily during Mass that was framed around the Styx song, "Mr. Roboto". Worst Catholic school ever.

Posted by: caine thomas at Nov 22, 2006 3:54:47 PM

Peter, of course it was you (in part) I was thinking of when I wrote that comment. I'm going to go ahead an pull your comment and post it - so subsequent commentors take note.

Maryknoll Fr. Mike, on the previous thread on this said,

"As soon as these clerical slapheads turned away from the altar, they saw all these eyes upon themselves, and drew the obvious conclusion: it's all about me."

There's more to it, surely, but it's a start.

I think, honestly, a lot of it has to do with limits and lack thereof, and human nature. Simple human nature.

And bluntly and brutally: When the priests and music ministers get bored with what they're doing....look out!

Posted by: Amy at Nov 22, 2006 3:56:00 PM

Hey Peter Nixon...I tried to send you an email on Monday to your excite email address. Did you get it? re: Deus Caritas Est.

In regard to "it works" arguments for mucking around with liturgy:
The golden calf worked.
Can't beat that for encouraging "full, active participation."

Posted by: Old Zhou at Nov 22, 2006 4:07:05 PM

Gosh. This is a liturgical travesty, but it's hard to get angry at them because it is so obviously well-intentioned without the slightest sacreligious intent. Rather than poop on the priest and people who obviously loved this 70s throwback liturgy, I'll make the constructive suggestion that, if they feel free to place a black table linen on the altar, then perhaps Father can, two days later, wear black vestments for All Souls Day.

Posted by: Patrick Rothwell at Nov 22, 2006 4:11:38 PM

Patrick, This isn't a matter of "getting angry at them". This is a matter of liturgical abuse, by anyone's standards. When a priest comes dressed as the devil to say Mass, no matter what the object lesson, there's a problem. St Kenneth's Catholic "Community" belongs to the Archdiocese of Detroit. There is no direct link to Cardinal Maida but infodesk@aod.org should get it there.

Posted by: therese at Nov 22, 2006 4:21:49 PM

You can tell me it does not work but I have talked with people who have been brought in by such efforts and have made a commitment to Jesus. People here seem so sure they are right they probably think I am lying or that the people involved are lying. Whatever. The reality is that protestants are not stupid. They do what they do because people respond. Sure they have the false idea that once someone has made that initial commitment the deal is closed but they do get them that far.

I'm all for respecting the mass but just ignoring the world does not seem right either. Should we send people down the street to our nearest protestant church if they want to hear music and a message they can relate to? Maybe we do and hope they come back after they have been drawn into a relationship with Jesus. Some will and some won't.

I'm coming to the conclusion that churches need to do some sort of evangelical outreach that is not a mass. That way we can channel all our impulses to love our neighbor in that without ruining the liturgy.

Posted by: Randy at Nov 22, 2006 4:37:29 PM

"Patrick, This isn't a matter of "getting angry at them". This is a matter of liturgical abuse, by anyone's standards."

I thought that what I said. Sorry, I can't muster the required seething outrage that All Good Catholics Must Have towards this. Go ahead and send the Requisite Outraged Letter To The Bishop And The Nuncio And The CDF and The Holy Father That They Do Something About It. If they're told no more Halloween masses, bully for you.

Posted by: Patrick Rothwell at Nov 22, 2006 4:39:24 PM

"It DOES NOT work.The people who are turned on by these shows are the avantguarde and the superficial.Anyone with a deep prayer life would be nauseated by such idiocy."

I don't agree with this Halloween mass or with the one in the California parish. I don't like it and I wish that people could just see the beauty in the Mass as it should be offered.

BUT.... how dare you judge the people attending these masses or any of the masses that tend to get criticized by commentors on this blog. They don't have a deep prayer life? How do you know??? They are superficial?? Who says? How do you know???

I am a pretty traditional person and dislike some of the silly "innovations" that people tend to put into the mass. I guarantee that a Liturgist didn't think up the Halloween Mass. It was regular folks in the parish.

Ok. Never mind. I'd better shut up now.

I'm just sick to death of the holier than thou attitude that shows up in the comments of this blog.

But, maybe I'm being holier than thou right now myself. Whatever.

Happy Thanksgiving

Posted by: Meggan at Nov 22, 2006 4:47:33 PM

Ok, this is snarky, but in a way it's revealing. So, realizing I'll get flamed here, here goes nothing....

In all of the photos of the families attending this -ceremony- did you notice that it appears that all of the women are wearing pants? And that the only person wearing a skirt is the guy?

DISCLAIMER-- I am not saying that women wearing pants is per se bad, just that the situation I described above struck me as funny.

Pax vobiscum!

Posted by: tim at Nov 22, 2006 4:47:48 PM

Except, Randy, the Halloween Mass is unlikely to be an evangelical device. The motivation probably is to give families who are already members to have a "wholesome" alternative or addition to trick-or-treating at the mall. That motivation is fine and dandy, just not in the liturgy.

Or, here is another alternative that will make most spikey sorts break out into hives, but it works. The next day, have an All Saints Day mass, and have the young kids dress up as a favorite saint. Then, during the homily, allow each kid (unless they are too shy) to say a word or two about the saint, with the priest filing in some gaps for everyone's edification. Of course, the priest will make the overarching homiletic point that everyone is called to be a saint, even if they aren't wearing a paper mache gridiron like "St. Lawrence," or slaying paper dragons like "St. George" or wearing prison garb like Saint so-and-so. The priest shouldn't dress in costume, obviously.

Now that isn't so bad, is it? The energies given to the Halloween mass can be re-directed that is both explicitly Catholic and fun.

Posted by: Patrick Rothwell at Nov 22, 2006 4:49:13 PM

Turn the priest around . . . please Holy Father! Make the absurd modern clericalism stop!

Posted by: WRiley at Nov 22, 2006 4:52:24 PM

Meggan:

You react rightly against the presumption.

Perhaps what the commentor should have pointed out was that liturgical ministers, including the priest, who really do understand the Mass, who have been formed by the greater tradition of the Church, who have even taken a look, say at the Gospel passages on the Last Supper, as well as what Paul says about Eucharist, wouldn't even dream of hooking up stuff like this to the Mass.

You know? How can you be immersed in the the Eucharist, in the Last Supper, in the Body and Blood of the LOrd and what it brings into this world, and the cost, and be joined to that and think it's all just a fun game which we can decorate and play at?

That's the question.

Posted by: Ted at Nov 22, 2006 4:55:30 PM

Halloween is just another artificial excuse for crass commercialism and it's aimed more at adults than kids these days. There's 50 times more stuff jammed into stores and a massive bombardment of advertising. For what?

1. So adults can persist in an adolescent state of development.
2. So big retailers and producers of cheap garbage can pad their profit margins.
3. So people can have yet one more excuse to bring bags and bags of candy to work without feeling self-conscious about over-eating and inactivity.

I hate Halloween. And Valentine's Day. And most of all I hate the day after Thanksgiving.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Posted by: caine thomas at Nov 22, 2006 5:05:01 PM

Here's a solution for this parish:

Do everything you did, have all the same fun and games, but with just two changes:

1.Don't use the church; instead, use the cafeteria, gym or "activity hall"; and,

2. Don't have Mass!

See how simple that was?

Posted by: Fr Martin Fox at Nov 22, 2006 5:48:20 PM

Caine Thomas wrote:

"Halloween is just another artificial excuse for crass commercialism and it's aimed more at adults than kids these days. There's 50 times more stuff jammed into stores and a massive bombardment of advertising."

All true, but there's more to it than that. Our kids (ages 6 and 3) had a wonderful time on Halloween. In addition to the fun and make-believe of picking a character for the night, there's the adventure of staying up late, and the mystery of vernturing out into the nightime world (with Mom and Dad, of course).

Patrick Rothwell suggested:

"The next day, have an All Saints Day mass, and have the young kids dress up as a favorite saint."

Our parish does a variant of this. On the Sunday following All Saints' Day, we have an All Saints Party in the Parish Hall that afternoon/evening. All the kids dress up as their Saint of choice, play games (with loose Saint themes), and win prizes. There's a potluck dinner, and then the kids line up and play "guess the Saint." The pre-teens seem to take particular delight in finding the Saint who comes closest to "St. Ethelred the Obscure" (but actually exists). I've learned quite a lot from these parties.

One note: the costumes are limited to the party. The Masses on that day proceed as is proper for the day.

Posted by: Don Roberts at Nov 22, 2006 5:51:02 PM

For the record, Plymouth is a very affluent suburb. I see no reason why the kids couldn't have gone trick-or-treating.

And also, my parish had a "wholesome alternative" to trick-or-treating. It was called "Trunk-or-treat" and people signed up for it. Bring your kids, and they trick-or-treat from car trunk to car trunk in the parish parking lot.

Posted by: Kasia at Nov 22, 2006 6:21:32 PM

Amy writes: "It is such a hard, hard thing to be in ministry...And so we struggle to figure out how to make our way in this, how to just get people in the door so they can just hear a bit - even a little bit - of what we have to say, and we pray we say it in a way that means something, that rises above the rest of the cacophany and might, just might next week bring them back for more - a little more, a little deeper."
That's just it, Amy: I don't care a whit what any "Director of Worship" or "Master of Ceremonies" or "Minister of Liturgy" has to say about anything. That's anything, with a capital "A". In fact, I pray daily that they'll all just shut up and get out of the way.
Whether they would believe it or not, I go to Mass to hear one voice - the one that isn't raised, the one I have to struggle to hear because of the theatrics and distractions. I find it hard to imagine that the people saying "look at me" are really trying to lead me deeper into Christ.

Posted by: marianne at Nov 22, 2006 7:38:10 PM

The people here in the slides all seem like genuinely nice folks, no reason to doubt that. Quite wholesome all around. Not the same sense of deliberately "queering the Mass" as in the Orange County spectacle. Instead it's more as if, for these folks, the Mass must have become just another party. How else could they have decided this was a good idea, and have put up a slide show in all good will and innocence displaying what was going on? I don't think anyone should get angry at these folks certainly, and, anyway, how can you get angry at people just for thinking and acting on the idea that "Religion = Being Nice," even if it's just a wraith of what the sacrifice of the Mass is? Better to get upset about the Shepherds everywhere who have simply let their flocks wander about in the dark, prey to all kinds of things.

Posted by: Little Gidding at Nov 22, 2006 7:53:49 PM

I agree with Don Roberts, above:

no costumes on anyone, at Mass, including kids. If the kids come to Mass in costumes, you will soon have a request from adults, and we're off to the races . . .

Posted by: Fr Martin Fox at Nov 22, 2006 8:51:33 PM

Post a comment