« Terry McAuliffe, Knight | Main | News of the World »
January 30, 2007
Catholic School Teachers..
...this thread's for you!
In honor of our continuing recognition of Catholic Schools Week, let's listen to the Catholic school teachers, from K-12 (or college), of religion or any subject.
It's said if you are talking about education, parents will always blame the teachers for the problems, and the teachers will always blame the parents. Not quite on topic, but it's commonly agreed among folks who work in parish religious ed that those in most need of catechesis are parents, first, then children. It's them we need for an hour a week, and can you even imagine the ethos of Protestant Sunday School for adults had even the slightest foothold in Catholic churches?
So it's interesting when you can see both sides - as, in fact, most teachers can, since most teachers, no matter where they work, are parents as well.
And for me, in 20+ years of seeing both sides, I'd have to say that my ultimate sympathies in that endless conversation lie with...the teachers.
Sure, some of them are not so competent. (One of my colleagues, teaching Honors World History, once joined me at lunch and asked, "So, tell me about this Edict thing that Constantine did. I don't really get it." The school chaplain was in the habit of referring to a particular class - I believe it was juniors - as "Visigoths." Same teacher looked at him blankly and asked, "What's a Visigoth?") Others (as a thread below aptly demonstrated) are destructive. But what , in general, do they have to work with?
An institution - on the local school level, as well as the broader bureaucracy, ranging all the way up to state systems and ed schools, which is enamored with process and method at the expense of content, coming up every few years with new complications and reasons for aggravating in-services.
Textbooks that reflect the above.
Parents who don't know how and don't care to discipline, who are busy, tired, and either emotionally absent or overprotective. And who view the high school diploma essentially as a document for which they have paid good money for, and which, with its attached GPA, represents nothing more than a ticket to the next step. So just hand it over please, so we can all move on.
And, most importantly, a culture which does not value, in the least, the content you're trying to convey, whether that content be quadratic equations, the Gospel of Mark, the New Deal or The Iliad.
The religion teacher has her own set of issues - non-Mass attending families, for one. sometimes surveyed my students as to how many of them had been to Mass the previous Sunday. By the time they were seniors, in a class of 30, 20 of whom were Catholic, usually 5 had made it. The reasons are many - two Sunday mornings ago, driving to Mass, our route took us by the Natatorium that's attached to Katie's high school. Big indoor swimming facility. The parking lot was packed with cars, the streets were lined with them - obviously some sort of city swim meet. On a Sunday morning. Soccer, scout events - rinse, repeat.
(I've often stated - and this is a subject for another post, perhaps on Thursday, that the fundamental problem with contemporary Catholic education is the vacuum in which it exists, not only in the broader culture, but in the Catolic culture as well, from family to parish and what used to be the neighborhoods and communities in which those parishes existed. Learning about saints wasn't just a textbook unit. Saints surrounded you in church - their images and their relics, both. You were probably named after a saint. Devotions to saints flourished and saints were used in homilies as models. Your community honored saints is feasts and processions and shrines. Now, it's all up to the schools, and the schools can't bear the brunt of it - it's not the way it's supposed to be anyway. Catholic schools, as we know them now, didn't exist for the vast majority of the Church's existence. But somehow the faith was passed on - without 100% comprehension, true - that's a given. But is it so much better now? A plea for the mythical era of "Catholic culture?" Not quite. Also blogged on here - the sometimes bitter fruit of "Catholic culture." But still - at no time in history has anyone believed that schools should bear the brunt of the responsibility for catechesis)
Anyway - just a couple more notes of Catholic religion teacher travails (aside from the obvious one - $$) - sometimes administrators are not helpful. I worked for a principal once, who while effective in many ways, was not particularly interested in religion and thought it would be okay if religion class were decreased from a 5-day a week class to maybe 3 - or 2.
Secondly, the attitude of parents, and by osmosis, their children, to religion class. Even though we're passed the era in which it was verbotem to give grades in religion courses for fear that the young impressionable ones would go away alienated because they would think that we were grading their personal faith, the second-class status of religion class still looms in many places. I never quite sorted this out myself, but it was a constant question at one of the schools at which I taught - didn't colleges, the students would insist, just drop religion grades when they re-factored GPAs? So, you know, it didn't matter what they made? Except...it did matter in terms of the school's calculations so your initial application as well as class rank factored in the religion grade, so when Junior snagged a "C" you knew you were in for a call from a Concerned Parent - primarily concerned about the impact of this rather unimportant course on The Future.
Long way from Queen of the Sciences, that is.
Schools are varied and different. The schools at which I taught shared some similarities - struggling, small, diocesan, in the South, with a hefty proportion of non-Catholics, ranging from 35-50%. Told you it was hefty. Schools that struggled mightily with identity, with great pressure to simply be an good alternative to the public schools for whomever. And since that was the case, we don't want to alienate or offend the non-Catholics. Which then just deepens the dynamic.
Some dioceses have estimable and excellent school systems with a clear sense of identity. One of my friends had taught in the St. Louis Archdiocese for years and she could never quite get over the difference. Another friend moved and ended up teaching in an Archdiocesan school in Philadelphia and she, too, was astonished to be finteaching in a place in which religious instruction was not a daily battle with students, parents and administration. Where it was valued.
So...there you go. It's all yours!
(Comments open in AM)
Posted by Amy Welborn | Permalink
Comments
Having taught now for six years in the sixth grade (after 20+ as a Methodist pastor), I can identify with all of your observations and insights, Amy.
Any illusions I had before coming into full communion with the Catholic Church about the walls of her schools insulating children and youth from the influence of the culture of death were shattered quite a while ago. My sixth graders eat, sleep, dream the soundtrack and values of pop culture.
My hope is that what they learn in the Religion curriculum will at least lie dormant until they face the crises that will inevitably come upon them, then break open as seeds of faith. For the present, it's great if I happen to see "Treat others the way you want to be treated," say, while I'm in the cafeteria during Lunch Duty ...
Posted by: Athos at Jan 31, 2007 5:56:13 AM
(I'm just a CCD teacher, so I hope I qualify to post.)
Re: Observation of Sunday: As a homeschooler, I don't give secular days off, but we don't have lessons on days of obligation. I was under the impression those were still "no work" days, insofar as possible, for Catholics; a recent column in our parish bulletin seemed to confirm that. Yet our parish school started classes on Aug. 15, just like all the city schools. My daughter, an altar server, was assisting at Mass that day and asked Father about it (genuinely curious); she says he just sighed and said it wasn't ideal, and that he was glad she had the day off.
Posted by: o.h. at Jan 31, 2007 8:38:24 AM
"My sixth graders eat, sleep, dream the soundtrack and values of pop culture."
My sixth graders do the same, yet they want to learn about God, Catholicism, the Bible, morality, etc. They have sharp, inquisitive, resourceful minds and respond to being treated accordingly. They think nimbly, and often surprise me with their perceptive conclusions drawn from disparate bits of information.
If anything gives me cause for optimism, it's the young Catholics in my Religious Ed class.
Posted by: Christian at Jan 31, 2007 9:25:50 AM
I could not agree more, Amy! I taught relgion in Fort Wayne (high school, Catholic) last year and now I am in the St. Louis Archdiocese. The contrast could not be more pronounced-- and, again, for all the reasons you write above. Parents are a big issue; but, even more (and surprisingly), the biggest obstacle in my experience of trying to bring about an authentic Catholic culture in FW was the diocesan administration. Whether it was better music, devotions, more opportunities for Mass, confession-- an advance was stifled. Archbishop Burke out here in St. Louis is amazing. He's behind the schools, the teachers, and the move for Catholic Culture 100%.
Posted by: Tony at Jan 31, 2007 9:50:46 AM
PS, Happy Feast of St. John Bosco!
Posted by: Tony at Jan 31, 2007 9:53:09 AM
I teach CCD, but I wanted to comment because my children did have some excellent teachers in the parish schools they attended -- teachers for whom educational fads didn't matter (although they kept up with the trends and tried to pull the best from them), and for whom basics were primary. One first grade teacher instilled a love of science (later decimated) in my two oldest children. A second grade teacher taught my third child grammar, giving her a jump start when we began to homeschool. A fourth grade teacher encouraged my oldest to write well, and a sixth grade teacher instilled the grammar and discipline she needed to develop those skills. Two art teachers (at different schools) gave her a sound base to devlop her talents. A French teacher encouraged my other daughter's love of the language at an early age, and showed my son that learning a language could be fun. Here's to you, wonderful teachers! If there were more of you, my kids would still be in Catholic schools, because your love for children and for what you teach is augmented by your faith! You lived your faith every day in the classroom with them, and they learned about God's love through you.
Posted by: scotch meg at Jan 31, 2007 9:53:47 AM
Excellent thoughts, Amy. I was a Catholic School kid, K-college.
Probably the most important teacher I had was in 7th & 8th grade. She was unafraid to speak up about the evils of abortion (we said "born and unborn" after the end of the pledge of Allegiance) and squelch sassy middle school attitudes.
By far the most important lesson she imparted was having a personal relationship with Jesus. She helped us encounter Him as a wonderful Friend. Sure, my parents had told me all that, but I had stopped listening. Thanks to my teacher's guidance, I began a friendship with Jesus that helped me endure the rest of the tween years and beyond.
After 17 years, I still keep in touch with my teacher. She even flew to California for my wedding last summer. I asked her to be one of the gift bearers. Quite appropriately, she brought up the ciborium of (unconsecrated) hosts. I told her that since she had helped bring me to Jesus, bringing up the gifts would be most appropriate.
Teachers DO touch lives. I try to remember that when in the classroom. If only teachers were paid as much as the professional athletes in this country...the former makes a bigger impact on our youth.
Happy Feast of St. John Bosco!
Posted by: Kristy at Jan 31, 2007 10:25:51 AM
I've taught English at 2 Catholic schools and also done CCD.
There's not only a pay gap, but also gaps in training and resources. This is a matter of justice in a society that mandates a tax-supported secular education for all students that one can opt out of by paying more.
Catholic schools have school on feast days because if they didn't, many kids wouldn't get to Mass.
Parents question grades and teaching methods, and sometimes content. They hardly if ever talk to teachers about faith, Jesus, the Church. English, history, science are all critical areas for a truly Catholic education and not just Religion class.
Posted by: Freder1ck at Jan 31, 2007 10:58:09 AM
When I was a freshman in college, my college grad neighbor told me that school was not so much a place to learn things, but to learn how to learn. When I later went to law school, I essentially discovered the same thing, and that we, for the most part, must teach ourselves. If we merely look at the knowledge needed to do our own jobs today, most of us will realize that we were self-taught to a large degree.
When I look back to grade school and high school, there are very few facts that I was taught that I still remember. Even with math, at which I always excelled (AP Calculus, SAT 750 score), but haven't used since high school, I cannot even remember quadratic equations.
So it is with kids today. Most of what they are taught, even with the greatest of teachers, will be long forgotten in a matter of years, if not months or weeks. In order to retain that knowledge, in order to continue to know things, they must continually learn for themselves. This is especially true with matters of the Faith. The Faith is a life-long journey.
Despite what we might see in science fiction movies, knowledge is not something that is injected into our brains, learning is an internal process. The key, then, is to instill in them a love of knowledge, a curiosity that will encourage them to continue learning and the faith journey on their own, and to develop in them the ability to think and process and reason so that, like Augustine, they can understand the things that they simply take on faith (because teacher or mom and dad or the priest says so), and with understanding comes greater faith and a desire for greater faith. Much of that must be done at home. First and foremost being an ability to read! And then there must be reinforcement at home.
Posted by: Bender at Jan 31, 2007 11:03:15 AM
Not a Catholic school teacher here, but my wife was one for several years in Belgium, both as a religion class teacher at a public school (which you can do there) and as a confirmation class teacher in a parish.
Her endless source of frustration was the attitude of parents who saw their parish as a sacrament-dispenser. She'd get 13 and 14 year olds who couldn't say basic prayers like the Our Father or Hail Mary, but was expected to have them well-formed for Confirmation in a few months. When her parish tried to institute a (rather modest) mass-attendance requirement for Confirmation, parents would just drop their kids off at mass and leave. Not a great environment for spiritual formation.
Posted by: Bill H at Jan 31, 2007 11:09:27 AM
For the first time this year, the majority of my school-age kids are in Catholic schools instead of homeschooled. It seems like there are special problem sets with all educational choices.
But by far, the hardest thing for all of my kids has been holding to the general ethos of kindness that we have insisted upon in the home, and having respect for the faith.
Example: teen daughter at all girls high school was bullied by classmate who kept saying "bad" words to my daughter to get a reaction. Proud of daughter who stood up for herself and called it what it was: "sexual harassment."
Example: teen son at all boys high school is planning to switch to Spanish from Latin next year because the teacher spends too much class time presenting salacious and "witty" commentary having nothing to do with grammar nor vocabulary. (The unit on the Greek gods was notably horrid.)
Example: teen son at Catholic K - 8 had the hardest time adjusting to the "normal" teasing that goes on.
On balance, we have been pretty happy with the pedagogical quality of the teachers, and found the administrations to be very supportive of our kids' efforts to adhere to the faith they have been taught at home. But, Amy is right that the parents seem to be the least well-catechized of the bunch, so is it any wonder that the kids are, well, heathen-ish?
Posted by: kristen at Jan 31, 2007 11:22:32 AM
What a great thread! I have had the joyful experience of teaching in two independent Catholic schools here in the Southwest. Last year, I worked in a school where the principal and her husband look at their work as a vocation. They also attend conferences with other independent Catholic school founders. The school is small and the curriculum has been created by culling the best of what is available. Ignatius Press’ Faith and Life is the Religion text. All the teachers take an oath of fidelity to the Magisterium. The parents and students are treated with love and respect no matter where they are in their knowledge of the Catholic faith. They are literally absorbed into a lovely culture and see, and hear good old-fashioned Catholicism. No one waters down the teachings of the Church and Charity reigns in the classroom and on the playground. The school is dedicated to St. Maximillian Kolbe, and the children consider him a family member.
When I set up my classroom, I put a sign up over the door, which read, “Future Saints walk through these doors!” I also used Mother Theresa’s quote, “Holiness in not the privilege of a few but the simple duty of all.” The Feast of All Saints was celebrated with great joy. Each student researched a saint and gave a speech in costume before the assembled families. Whenever an ambulance passed by on our busy street, no one had to tell the students to drop what they were doing and say a Hail Mary for the person inside. There are bright spots out there, but they seem to be created by those who have had diocesan Catholic school educations and want something better for their children and for the Church.
Posted by: S at Jan 31, 2007 11:24:50 AM
I am a theology teacher in one of those half Catholic southern schools. It is a great job. Most of the kids have little faith and few see the importance of faith. Very few convert although there have been a couple.
Alec Guiness is his autobiography Blessings in Disguise narrates the story of the headmaster telling him matter of factly that his son would most likely convert if he attended the school. I would have liked to see a day in the life at that school.
Maybe a quarter of the students I teach have anything more than a nominal religious background. Religion is not foreign to most them for they know of it, but it is at the same time not taken seriously. Many students with strong faith backgrounds leave with that same strength. Some do not. Very few come in with no religious faith and leave with faith.
With that being said, I have a great job. I have heard many say that Catholic high schools are a lesson in futility. It is said that K-8 is where the character formation happens. There is truth to that but Theology class gives that quarter intellectual ammunition to sustain their belief. It also gives student at least to formulate questions regarding God and Morality. It is a place to shake the secular foundation upon which their education rests.
My big problem withhe state of Catholic education is that religion is presented as icing on the cake. The argument for religion is basically a moral argument or a Utilitarian one. (Faith and doing good will make you happy) I think we should stress doctrine first and morality second. "Love God and do as you will"
Bell rang must go
Posted by: frankxx at Jan 31, 2007 11:59:56 AM
In addition to the press of the broader culture on the children, I wonder about the press of the "professional educator" culture on teachers.
So much of the materials given to teachers that I have seen as a CCD teacher and as a parent of elementary school kids is full of pedagogical gobbledygook. Teaching is now a profession, and a second grade teacher is thinking about getting her — very few male teachers in elementary schools these days — masters degree in education.
The nuns had nothing to prove to the worldly bodies of authority and needed nothing from them. A young woman who has consecrated her life to God and serves him in Catholic schools has a great deal more power and freedom than a young woman who has embarked on a career as an educator compensated with a competitive salary and benefits package.
Unconventional instruction will come from unconventional instructors, and the Catholic school system is weakened as it becomes increasingly conventional.
Posted by: Sidney at Jan 31, 2007 12:42:44 PM
I taught in two separate Catholic high schools for one year each before leaving teaching for the law. Taught history and civics in Charlotte, NC, and then religion and health in Pittsburgh, PA.
Amy's post articulates my memories of those years pretty well. I liked teaching and liked the kids. But I was shocked to discover how disinterested in the Faith most parents were. I had thought that parents would be teaching Catholicism at home and would want us to build on that. Not so: instead they were looking for a cheap way out of the public schools, and could have cared less about the religious component except insofar as it made the school "safe."
Posted by: Joe Magarac at Jan 31, 2007 1:10:05 PM
I can relate to many of the remarks by Amy as well as many of the commenters.
Let me add this to the mix:
In looking back on my experience teaching high school religion (for four years), I wish going in that I would have had more training in how to deal with students with serious psychological issues.
Two months into my first year of teaching, one student wrote -- in the essay section on a test paper that she had just completed -- that she was considering suicide.
On another occasion, another student divulged to me during a Kairos retreat that she had recently attempted suicide.
In either case, I don't remember what exactly I said in response to these students, but I remember very clearly that I felt I was in way over my head.
(Of course, I also promptly reported both instances to my principal, as teachers are required to do by law. The principal promptly alerted the school social worker -- yes, this Catholic high school had a licensed social worker on staff -- who began seeing both students.)
But as a "first responder" of sorts, what kind of training did I have to deal with a student in such a situation?
Almost none. Ed. Psych. classes in college superficially deal with this, but that doesn't cut it.
It seems to me that if a teenager is going to divulge to someone that he or she is considering suicide -- that person is very possibly going to be one of his or her teachers.
And given my experience, teachers in Catholic schools -- especially young ones, fresh out of college, as I was -- have little or no expertise in how to respond to these students.
Posted by: John at Jan 31, 2007 1:44:21 PM
I teach at a Southern 75% Catholic high school, and it is not an unmixed blessing.
I chose to teach in Catholic schools because I was educated in Catholic schools (kindergarten through undergrad) and because I truly believe in the mission of Catholic schools. I read the National Directory for Catechesis and was thrilled to think of myself as called specifically to be a catechist, even though my content area is not religious studies but British literature.
One of the problems with the state of Catholic education in our area of the country is that these schools have been dependent on the support of non-Catholic families for many years and have focused on excellence in areas other than Catholic identity. It's a hard position to be in, really. We offer a strong academic curriculum, good fine arts programs, and nationally-ranked athletic programs...and oh yes, we happen to be Catholic as well.
Not that excellence in those areas is bad -- it's not -- but the issue has become that we attract people who want to take advantage of the academics or the athletics and are willing to tolerate "the Catholic thing" in order to have the others. And as an institution, we haven't historically done a good job of asserting our Catholic identity in spite of those folks. In fact, we have separate requirements for religious studies courses -- a track for Catholics and a track for non-Catholics. The community perception, too, is that we're a great private school, but people who've lived here for years aren't sure that it's a Catholic school; I get asked frequently about that.
I think that students who come here with a strong foundation in their faith are able to retain it and those who don't frequently lose it. Religious studies courses and homilies at Masses are a lot more about the religion of nice rather than a sturdy formation in the truths of Catholicism. Our students are well versed in moral relativism.
In spite of it all, though, it's a blessing to be in an environment where I have the freedom to speak about truth that leads to the Truth of the Word Made Flesh, and though we suffer from the frailties and flaws of any institution, there's great hope here as well.
Bell rang...got to run!
Posted by: Scherza at Jan 31, 2007 2:01:45 PM
It's difficult to assess the threats vs. the opportunities here.
Surprisingly, as people get hip to "the heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to..." (the fallout of our scientifically permissive culture), parents are turning to homeschooling in increasing numbers. Because the workplace so often makes outrageous demands on people's time and attention, working parents are reevaluating their careers and jobs in light of the abuse, and reconfiguring to situations and lifestyles offering greater domestic stability. In these contexts, it is also much easier for parents to be involved with traditional schools.
On the negative side, we are seeing what is largely an inimical drift toward pseudo-professionalism and centralization in the educational arena. Rather than focusing on basic problems like the inadequacy of preparation in core subject areas, many programs are preoccupied with training in the capacity and disposition to "make nice" so that no groups or individuals are threatened in their bodies or egos -- with the exception of the occasional "religious nut" who questions these programs. On top of this, the ungovernable rise in costs of these regimes heightens the pressure to centralize to achieve economies of scale.
So, how do we reverse decades of fluff substituting for religious instruction when the religious educators themselves have had so little opportunity to correct their own backgrounds? How do we help home schooling parents avoid the pitfalls of protectionism when they themselves have had little opportunity to learn how to think in a "politically correct" world?
The answer lies in the initiative of the parents to correct their own misinformation so that they can pass on the real faith to their children. The answer lies in teachers and clerics who take the same initiative, and administrators who become hep enough to stay out of the way (except when whole faculties become heterodox). The Church has made this process relatively easy with the CCC and dozens of highly informative encyclicals, exhortations, instructions, communications, etc., and numerous lay individuals and organizations have added helpful commentaries.
In other words, if people focus on what the Magisterium of the Church is saying and do their best to understand it, they can overcome all of the obstacles that government, pseudo-professionalism, secular lobbies, etc. throw in their way.
Posted by: Fr. Larry Gearhart at Jan 31, 2007 3:00:13 PM
I struggle with parents who can't believe their child can fail 8th grade religion (and have...for the whole year). Therefore, they don't back me up...until its too late.
I have students who tell me that, "Dad said that was stupid because..." Or who try to tell me stories about the sins their cousin/brother/mother commits.
I have had students come in and say (after a talk about the Sunday Obligation the prior week), "I made my family go to Church this past weekend."
These would seem to be really depressing things, and the first is...but the other two at least make me happy that the Lord has put one person in their path to help them. I've talked with students who broke my heart because of the things they contended with (sex and drugs in 8th grade), but I was glad that I could talk with them.
Quite frequently the first teacher a kid will go to is the religion teacher, I've noticed. We hear so much personal stuff during class, that we seem to be the "open ones." I'm happy to do that; it is a joy, though I wish my kids could just be kids still.
I teach at a Southern, 60% non-Catholic school. I know the struggles of textbooks and tightrope walking when talking ecumenism, but I give my big shout out to our priests. We have some of the most committed priests attached with our regional school. They make my work easier, and are a joy to work with. We offer weekly Mass with them, and penance services twice a year. They will talk with the students on specific topics if we ask. They are young, orthodox, and relate to the kids. May everyone be so blessed as we are.
Posted by: nab at Jan 31, 2007 10:10:25 PM
It is my understanding that school related events are not to be scheduled after 6 p.m. on Wednesdays in the local public school system. I'm not sure if it is a written requirement or just a custom. Of course, Wednesday IS church or prayer meeting night here in the Bible Belt. The local Catholic parish schedules Wednesday weekday Mass accordingly.
Posted by: Elena at Feb 1, 2007 11:28:46 AM
I'll let you know in a year. I just got hired last minute to teach Senior World religions at a local catholic high school in DC - mostly minority, mostly poor, mostly non-Catholic.
Two weeks into it, and a phrase that stands out to me is... 'bright-eyed young men and women swimming in the midst of dark and dangerous waters...'
Posted by: Nate Wildermuth at Feb 1, 2007 8:10:49 PM
7th and 8th grade religion teacher. I tell my students their main job is to get others to heaven, the most important of whom is their parents. Youth catechists now have a unique opportunity to catechize to adults through their children. Parents of my generation, who don't know shinola, can be hearing it from their kids.
Posted by: Bob at Feb 2, 2007 6:12:02 PM



















